[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Critics demand federal action after second golden eagle death at Nevada wind farm in 3 years  

A lawyer for Western Watersheds Project, an Idaho-based environmental group that joined in the earlier legal effort to block the wind farm, said in a letter to the Fish and Wildlife Service and BLM earlier this week that it was "extremely disappointed" by the second fatality. The group demanded to know what would be done to prevent future deaths. "The only mitigation done after the first golden eagle kill was a survey," staff attorney Kristin Ruether wrote. "We expect a far more robust response to this second unauthorized kill."

Credit:  By SCOTT SONNER Associated Press | First Posted: February 25, 2015 | www.greenfieldreporter.com ~~

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has confirmed another golden eagle has been killed at a Nevada wind farm near the Utah line, and conservationists are demanding federal regulators do something about it.

Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman Dan Balduini said Wednesday he couldn’t speculate about how the agency might respond after the second golden eagle in three years was found dead Feb. 9 at Spring Valley Wind Energy.

Pattern Energy owns the facility in White Pine County, about 250 miles northeast of Las Vegas.

“We are aware of it,” Balduini told The Associated Press from Las Vegas.

Golden eagles are not listed as threatened or endangered, but they are protected under other federal laws.

Two groups that sued unsuccessfully to block construction of the wind farm in 2011 say the government let the San Francisco-based company off last time with nothing more than a promise to do better at the site west of Great Basin National Park.

“There’s no incentive for a wind energy developer to commit to anything if they are not held accountable for whacking birds they are not supposed to be whacking,” said Rob Mrowka, senior scientist of the Center for Biological Diversity based in Tucson, Arizona.

“What they are basically saying is, ‘OK, government, we are calling your bluff. We don’t think you are going to do anything anyway,'” he told the AP.

Rene Braud, Pattern Energy’s director of environmental compliance and policy, said possible golden eagle fatalities were anticipated when the Fish and Wildlife Service granted the necessary permit to open the wind farm in 2012. The facility has 66 giant turbines spread across about 12 square miles of land managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.

“The project implemented mitigation measures, including power pole retrofits, to account for this,” she said in an emailed statement. “It is unfortunate when any eagle is lost, and we will continue our efforts to reduce the project’s impact.”

The company submitted a request last year for another permit from the federal wildlife agency to allow for the incidental taking of birds protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. It has not yet been approved.

Pattern Energy believes other energy facilities and industries result in “far more bird fatalities than wind projects,” Braud said.

“We would note that this is the second time over a period of more than two years of operations, while we have provided clean power to more than 45,000 homes each year with zero emissions,” she said.

A lawyer for Western Watersheds Project, an Idaho-based environmental group that joined in the earlier legal effort to block the wind farm, said in a letter to the Fish and Wildlife Service and BLM earlier this week that it was “extremely disappointed” by the second fatality. The group demanded to know what would be done to prevent future deaths.

“The only mitigation done after the first golden eagle kill was a survey,” staff attorney Kristin Ruether wrote. “We expect a far more robust response to this second unauthorized kill.”

Source:  By SCOTT SONNER Associated Press | First Posted: February 25, 2015 | www.greenfieldreporter.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Wildlife


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: