LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Oakfield wind project wins court challenge on environmental concerns 

Credit:  By Darren Fishell, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Posted Feb. 24, 2015 | bangordailynews.com ~~

A federal judge has rejected challenges to federal permits for a 50-turbine wind farm in Oakfield that broke ground in September and shipped components to Searsport on Monday.

U.S. District Judge Jon Levy on Monday ruled in favor of the wind project developers, SunEdison, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others, denying motions for summary judgment from environmental groups and people who own camps in the area.

Those plaintiffs argued the Army Corps of Engineers made mistakes in approving a permit for the $360 million project, which involved filling in certain wetlands and streams.

Levy said in an order issued Friday that he found fault with the plaintiffs’ arguments that the Army Corps did not adhere to the proper scientific standards or processes to determine that the project did not violate the federal Clean Water Act and other laws protecting endangered species.

The ruling came in favor of Evergreen Wind Power II LLC and Maine GenLead LLC, subsidiaries of the wind power developer First Wind, which was purchased and became a part of solar power giant SunEdison through a deal that closed in January.

The ruling also denied a motion for summary judgment from the plaintiffs Protect Our Lakes and the Forest Ecology Network and other individuals.

Both sides argued before Levy in a Feb. 12 hearing in Bangor, where plaintiffs contested that the Army Corps of Engineers should have requested a formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in approving the permit and that it should have given the project specific permissions for the possible “taking” of endangered bald eagles and Atlantic Salmon.

Levy found the Army Corps did not violate federal law in approving the permit without those specific authorizations.

Source:  By Darren Fishell, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Posted Feb. 24, 2015 | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon