[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ordinance clarifications called for  

Credit:  The World | February 19, 2015 | theworldlink.com ~~

Bob Westerman’s Letter to the Editor (Feb. 14) indicates that he either didn’t understand the explanations provided to him at a recent community rights meeting or he is deliberately attempting to mislead Coos County voters. The Coos County Right to a Sustainable Energy Future Ordinance does not ban wind and hydro unless those systems are used unsustainably.

(d) Non-sustainable energy systems means those systems that are controlled by state and federal energy policies, rather than community controlled energy policies; hydroelectric power and industrial scale wind power when it is not locally or municipally owned and operated;

Two prime examples of non-sustainable use of renewable resources are the Klamath River hydroelectric dams that decimated a fishing industry and the Shepherd’s Flat wind farm which gobbled up thousands of acres of ranch and farm land to ship Oregon wind power to California.

Regarding rights of nature

c) Rights of Natural Communities and Ecosystems to Thrive. Natural communities and ecosystems within Coos County, including but not limited to, forests, rivers, streams, wetlands, aquifers, near shore habitats, and intertidal zones possess the right to exist, flourish, and naturally evolve unaffected by the construction, siting, or operation of non-sustainable energy systems.

This ordinance does not allow a herd of elk to obtain legal counsel to seek an injunction against hunters or grant civil liberties to your backyard trees. It simply acknowledges that nature existed long before the man made construct of “property” ever came into our collective consciousness. It means “…that nature in all its life forms has the right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles. The ecosystem itself can be named as a rights bearing subject with standing in a court of law.”

Nature’s right to thrive as described within this ordinance provides another layer of legal protection only against unwanted non-sustainable energy systems.

Westerman is to be commended for encouraging a vote, however, as other pro-gas advocates like John Knutson and Jon Barton have refused to sign a petition to even put the initiative on the ballot. They don’t want the rest of us to have a choice.

Their position is precisely why we need this ordinance, to rein in the decades of unchecked and ill-advised and unsustainable development that has so impoverished Coos County.

Mary Geddry


Source:  The World | February 19, 2015 | theworldlink.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.