LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Campaigners’ relief as wind farm refused for Mynydd Marchywel 

Credit:  South Wales Evening Post | February 03, 2015 | www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk ~~

Communities across the Dulais and Dyffryn Valleys are celebrating after news that an appeal against Neath Port Talbot Council’s decision to refuse a five-turbine wind farm, has been refused.

In December, the planning inspectorate held a six-day hearing into renewable energy company RES’s appeal against the refusal, which was passed by members of the council’s planning committee in February last year.

Yesterday, it was revealed that the appeal had been dismissed, after RES posted a statement on its website, saying it was “disappointed” at the decision.

If permission had been granted, the company would have built five turbines on land at Mynydd Marchywel, between Rhos, Crynant and Cilfrew.

The news was welcomed by members of the Mynydd Marchywel Protection Group.

“It’s fabulous news,” said Gwyn Thomas, of Crynant, speaking after the Post broke the news to him.

“We have all worked so hard, but if it wasn’t for Simon Boex and Peter Hain, if it wasn’t for them pushing and pushing, we would not have got here.

“What a relief.”

Development manager at RES, Chris Jackson said: “We are surprised and saddened that the planning inspector did not uphold our request for planning permission to be granted for the Mynydd Marchywel Wind Farm.

“The only reason for refusal being defended by Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council was whether the visual impact of the turbines would be acceptable.

“RES believes it had carefully designed the project to position the turbines at an acceptable distance from the nearest properties – the Planning Inspector disagrees.”

He added that the plan would have delivered “significant” social and economic benefits to the communities, including a community benefits package of up to £57,500 per year – or about £1.4m over its 25 year lifetime, with a further £1.4 million injected into the local economy in the first year of operation through the sourcing of labour, services and materials from the area.

Source:  South Wales Evening Post | February 03, 2015 | www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon