LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Pulham Market wind turbine plans denied by Government 

Credit:  Michelle Finch | Diss Mercury | 23 January 2015 | www.dissmercury.co.uk ~~

Plans to construct three turbines in south Norfolk have been thrown out by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles MP.

TCI Renewables had lodged a scheme for the Upper Vaunces Wind Farm villages of Dickleburgh, Pulham Market, Pulham St Mary and Rushall.

An appeal by TCI Renewables was sent to Mr Pickles after South Norfolk Council rejected the plans last April.

A spokesman from South Norfolk Council said: “South Norfolk Council is pleased that the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles MP, has agreed with the council’s decision.”

Mr Pickles denied the plans after concluding there was significant harm to the setting of St Marys Church, Rushall and harm to other heritage assets and this harm outweighed the benefits of the renewal energy proposal.

He also said the impacts of the proposals are not, and cannot be made acceptable.

A previous proposal by TCI Renewables (TCIR) for a wind farm at Upper Vaunces Farm was dismissed at appeal by a planning Inspector in October 2012.

Following a thorough review of the comments in the Inspector’s decision letter, TCIR then developed a revised design for the site – a scheme now rejected by Mr Pickles.

The turbines would be up to 126m in height and it is claimed they could generate enough power for 3,500 homes.

a statement on TCI Renewables’ windfarm website said the company believes that the new wind farm layout satisfactorily addresses these previous issues, and that any remaining impact is not unduly harmful and is clearly outweighed by the renewable energy benefits of the wind farm in the wider public interest.

Source:  Michelle Finch | Diss Mercury | 23 January 2015 | www.dissmercury.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky