LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Families taking fight against wind farms to Ontario’s top court 

Credit:  Colin Perkel, The Canadian Press | Published Wednesday, January 21, 2015 | ctvnews.ca ~~

TORONTO – Four rural families fighting construction of industrial wind farms near their homes are hoping Ontario’s top court will listen to their arguments.

The families have asked the Ontario Court of Appeal to let them challenge last month’s lower court ruling allowing the projects to go ahead.

They argue their case is of wider significance to the public and includes whether the turbine-permitting process is constitutional.

“The proposed appeal raises issues of first instance in Ontario and affects all Ontarians given the proliferation of wind projects in the province,” their supplementary notice of motion for leave to appeal states.

According to the motion filed this week, the main problem is that the province’s Environmental Protection Act allows the government to act “without regard to public health and by denying citizens a means of relief in the face of a reasonable prospect of serious harm.”

In December, a three-judge Divisional Court panel in London, Ont., rejected that idea. The court refused to undo permits for the wind farms – one of which will be among the largest in the country, with 140 turbines near Goderich, Ont.

The Drennans, Dixons, Ryans and Kroeplins worry the turbines pose potential health risks that increase the closer they are to their homes.

Currently, the rules do not require wind-farm companies to provide reports on any public-health impacts, the motion states.

In addition, they say, once a permit has been issued, citizens can only have them overturned before the Environmental Review Tribunal if they can prove the turbines will cause serious harm to their health or the environment.

“This case thus represents the opportunity to rule on whether this test legislatively permits violations of Section 7 of the Charter by denying citizens relief in the face of a reasonable prospect of serious harm to health,” their motion states.

The families want the Appeal court to look at recently released results from a Health Canada study which found wind farms can cause “annoyance,” which in turn can pose a health risk.

Project proponents, which include multinational giant Samsung, maintain the wind farms are safe, and were properly approved according to all the rules after relevant consultations and studies.

In its ruling, the Divisional Court panel found the review tribunal had made no errors after considering evidence related to the turbines.

“That evidence was to the effect that causal conclusions based solely on self-reported health problems were scientifically speculative and likely misleading,” the court said.

Separately, the Ontario Court of Appeal is still deciding on a request from a wind-power company to nix an earlier ruling banning turbines from an area of the Lake Ontario shore because they pose a hazard to at-risk Blanding’s turtles.

Source:  Colin Perkel, The Canadian Press | Published Wednesday, January 21, 2015 | ctvnews.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon