[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Communities being “swamped” by renewable energy applications  

Credit:  By Jane Candlish | The Press and Journal | 21 January 2014 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Anti-windfarm campaigners have called for a moratorium on new turbine developments in the north amid fears the region is being “swamped” by turbines.

They claim 500 of the devices have been built or are planned within a few miles of iconic Loch Ness and want a full assessment carried out of the impact on the area’s scenery.

The protesters spoke out as members of Highland Council’s south planning committee granted permission for two wind speed masts near Drumnadrochit.

Energy firms Force 9 Energy and EDF want the structures to gather information for the proposed Cnoc an Eas windfarm near Balnain.

About 200 people objected to the mast plans because they were worried they would pave the way for more turbines in the area.

Anti-windfarm campaigner Lyndsey Ward said that there were more than 500 turbines already planned or approved within 20 miles of the Cnoc an Eas development.

She said: “That number must have a cumulative effect on the area.

“We need to stop this, it is out of control.

“People are now starting to realise that it’s not just the windfarms. They need transmission lines as well.”

Ms Ward added: “No other developments should be approved until those given permission are constructed so that we can see how many we have, if we need any more, if they are performing as expected and ask ‘can the landscape realistically absorb any more turbines?’.”

During yesterday’s meeting, Councillor Margaret Davidson pointed out that all the major items on the agenda were for windfarm-related developments in her ward, Aird and Loch Ness.

She said: “Almost every one of the objections is about the fact that it is a potential precursor to a windfarm.

“I think we need to be thinking about whether we pull the two things together.

“People are hacked off. They are seeing mast applications, then a windfarm application, then a substation application, and then an overhead transmission line application.

“I think that as elected members, we have a key issue about principle and practice and how we deal with windfarms.

“Communities are swamped by them. They are finding it difficult to cope and we are getting repeated large numbers of objections.

“We can see the extent of community feeling on this, although there is a mixture out there.”

She added: “Every time we get one of these, there is an increasing number of objections about the windfarm. We should take account of what that is happening.”

Inverness Central councillor Donnie Kerr said: “We have a lot of people writing in but we are more or less told we can’t do anything about it. It makes a mockery of consultation.”

Councillors approved the two masts yesterday on the condition bird deflectors were fixed to the guy ropes.

inverness South councillor Thomas Prag, who is also chairman of the local authority’s planning committee, said a report about windfarm strategy would be discussed by members next month, and this would update the council’s guidance on dealing with turbine applications.

He added: “If we made a policy statement to say that there was a moratorium in Highland, then the chances are that developers would still apply.

“We might try and refuse them but they could just go to appeal.

“While I can understand why people want a moratorium, the impact is that we lose control and hand over power to the government.”

Meanwhile, Andrew Smith, head of planning and development for Force 9 Energy, said: “I am very pleased with the pragmatic decision taken by the planning committee.

“We will be considering the issues raised and planning to go back out to the community with public exhibitions in the spring. We are considering the comments made.”

Source:  By Jane Candlish | The Press and Journal | 21 January 2014 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.