[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

FERC sets hearing on Geronimo wind farm complaint  

Credit:  14 Jan 2015 | www.argusmedia.com ~~

A developer trying to start up a 200MW wind farm in North Dakota by the end of this year may have to wait for federal regulators to weigh in on its complaint over the availability and cost of transmission.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) yesterday said the issues that Minnesota-based Geronimo Wind Energy raised in a complaint last year were “complex” and could not be resolved based on the existing record. The agency ordered the start of hearings but also encouraged the wind farm and other companies involved in the dispute to reach a settlement.

Geronimo in its complaint asked FERC to find that a 345kV transmission line it wants to use for its 200MW Courtenay wind farm would be subject to tariffs that apply in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) region. The company is trying to put the wind farm into service by 31 December 2015 to meet a power purchase agreement with Xcel Energy.

The Minnkota Power Cooperative wants to charge extra fees on the line, of which it owns the majority, and require approval for its use because the utility is not a member of the midcontinent grid. The complaint in contrast says a 1966 transmission contract gave Otter Tail Power the right to use the 345kV line if capacity was available. Otter Tail became a MISO member in 2001, at which time Geronimo says those transmission rights transferred into the midcontinent grid.

FERC in its order yesterday did not rule on the merits of the complaint. The commission said it would need to not only interpret the 1966 agreement but also review the effect the matter could have on MISO’s operations.

ck/ee

Source:  14 Jan 2015 | www.argusmedia.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: