[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

RSPB challenges 4 major windfarm developments 

Credit:  The Scotsman | 13 January 2015 | www.scotsman.com ~~

A judicial review has been sought by the RSPB Scotland against the consent granted to four major offshore wind farm projects off the east coast of Scotland.

The wildlife charity has lodged a legal challenge against the consent granted by Scottish Ministers to developments in the Firth of Forth and Firth of Tay last October.

Combining hundreds of turbines the the Inch Cape, Neart na Gaoithe and Seagreen Alpha and Bravo projects could provide 2.284 gigawatts of power, enough to power over 1.4m homes every year.

Consent was given under strict conditions to mitigate any potential environmental impact, and backing was given by environmental groups including Friends of the Earth Scotland.

However the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Scotland objected to the plans and raised fears over the proximity of seabird colonies.

Large colonies of gannet, kittiwake, puffin and razorbill breed along the coastlines near the wind farm sites, including the 110,000 gannet colony at the Bass Rock and puffin breeding grounds at the Isle of May.

The matter is now set to be decided at the Court of Sessions in Edinburgh after the charity submitted its legal challenge on January 9.

A spokesman said: “We have not taken this decision lightly, but having given serious consideration to these decisions to grant consent, we have decided to take legal action.

“RSPB Scotland has a proven track record of taking a stand for nature, on behalf of our members and the general public, to ensure that wildlife and the natural environment is properly safeguarded for the future.

“If these decisions are allowed to stand, they could have serious implications for how birds and important wildlife sites are protected across Scotland and beyond.

“The vast majority of renewable energy developments pose no significant threat to birds or other wildlife.

“RSPB Scotland continues to support the development of carefully sited and designed renewables, including offshore wind. However, individual developments must be sited to avoid significant harm.”

Lindsay Leask, senior policy manager at Scottish Renewables, said the challenge by RSPB Scotland was “really disappointing news”.

She said: “Every one of these projects has been through an incredibly rigorous, detailed and independent assessment lasting anywhere between one and two years, and it now looks like there will be another lengthy examination of that process in court before they can go ahead.

“This action is now holding up two-thirds of the schemes in development around our coastline. This new delay will make it even harder for Scotland to catch up with the rest of UK and Northern Europe, which already have a sizeable offshore wind industry and supply chain supporting thousands of jobs.

She added: “The irony here is that climate change is reckoned to be one of the biggest threats to Scotland’s protected habitats and species. Offshore wind is a key part of the mix required for us to meet our targets for the growth of renewables and the reduction of carbon emissions.”

The Neart na Gaoith wind farm east of the Fife Ness coastline would include up to 75 turbines, generating 450MW of power.

The Alpha and Bravo Seagreen developments combined would consist of up to 150 turbines, around 16-23 miles (27-38km), off the Angus coastline, and could generate 1,050MW.

And the Inch Cape development, also off the Angus coastline, would total no more than 110 turbines, generating 784MW.

Source:  The Scotsman | 13 January 2015 | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon