[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Dorset County Council stands firm on Navitus Bay wind farm plans  

Credit:  by Rachel Stretton, Senior Reporter | Dorset Echo | 31 December 2014 | www.dorsetecho.co.uk ~~

Dorset County Council is continuing to oppose the Navitus Bay wind farm plans despite an offer to reduce the number of turbines from 194 to 85.

A report put before cabinet at a meeting at County Hall in Dorchester originally recommended councillors endorse the officer’s view that the ‘mitigation option’ is admissible in planning terms.

But ward councillors Bill Trite and Margaret Phipps urged the cabinet not to accept the offer.

Cllr Phipps, who represents the Commons ward on Dorset County Council, said it was a ‘material’ change and it was up to the examining authority, not Dorset County Council, to rule whether the new proposals were admissible.

And Cllr Trite, who represents Swanage on the county council, added: “For all we know, this plan B could have been what Navitus Bay Development Ltd had intended all along as a fallback position.

“It’s presented as a big concession to those who are opposed to this appalling disfiguration of this beautiful part of the world.”

Cabinet member for environment Peter Finney said the recommendation had already been changed to reflect that it is the examining authority’s decision to decide whether it is admissible or whether a new planning application will have to be submitted.

Mike Harries, director for environment and the economy, warned the cabinet against stating that one option is preferred over another because, although fewer wind turbines would mean a lesser visual impact, there would also be reduced economic benefits.

But Colin Jamieson, cabinet member for public health and the community, warned that profits from the scheme would ‘go abroad’.

He added: “If we are looking at generating electricity there are more effective and less invasive ways of doing it.

“I think it will have an adverse effect. I think any windfarm in that area would have an adverse effect.”

Paul Kimber, county councillor for Portland, addressed the cabinet in support of the scheme – the original scheme or revised.

He said: “We need to keep the lights on and meet international commitments.

“We need to keep electricity cheap. At some time in the future we need to sit down with this company and ask what is in it for us in Dorset.”

Chairing the meeting, Cllr Robert Gould, leader of the county council, said: “We need to say we are opposed to the scheme, which we have previously stated.”

Source:  by Rachel Stretton, Senior Reporter | Dorset Echo | 31 December 2014 | www.dorsetecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter