[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Council refuses Redford wind turbines plan 

Credit:  By Richard Watt | The Courier | 31 December 2014 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

A proposed wind development in south Angus has been refused due to an “unacceptable” impact on the surrounding landscape.

Crofts Farm Renewables had applied to install two turbines of almost 80 metres in height near Redford.

The scheme was to generate 1.6MW in total and developers planned to include an access track and electrical building.

But planners refused the application, as the height of the proposed turbines would have “an unacceptable landscape impact”.

It was felt the scale of the turbines would be greater than the nearby Cairnconon Hill, with council officers adding: “In essence, the ridge would look smaller and less pronounced than is currently the case.”

Case officer Ruari Kelly added: “While it is acknowledged that any wind turbine will have a substantial impact on the landscape of its immediate locality, it is considered that the proposed turbines relate poorly to the scale of the surrounding landscape and that significant effects upon landscape character are likely to occur.”

No objections were offered by consultees, while seven letters of objection and nine of support were submitted.

The site was 862 metres north-east of the village and is in use as agricultural land.

There are 20 residential properties located within 1km but planners felt no views from those houses would be enough to refuse the application.

Mr Kelly added: “Having regard to the physical relationship between the houses in the village and the turbines, I do not consider that the impact on their residential amenity would be so significant as to be unacceptable and justify refusal of the application as a result.”

Source:  By Richard Watt | The Courier | 31 December 2014 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon