LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents claiming victory over Lee Valley windfarm 

Credit:  By Catherine Ketch | The Southern Star | www.southernstar.ie ~~

The spokesperson for a group of families which won a High Court battle against a windfarm in the Lee Valley last week has said it’s deeply unfair that citizens should be burdened with the cost of ensuring public bodies carry out their responsibilities.

‘In the current financial climate, this prevents most people accessing appropriate decisions through the Irish justice system,’ said Paul Green, spokesperson for the twelve families living near the proposed Derragh Wind Farm at Réidh na nDoirí which won a judicial review on Friday.

‘The residents are delighted with the decision. It turned out better than we could have imagined,’ Mr Green said.

The High Court, in quashing the permission, found that An Bord Pleanala (ABP) had failed to carry out a legally required assessment of the full range of impacts which the entire project would have on the locality. Overturning the Board’s decision, Mr Justice Michael Peart agreed with local residents that ABP had acted unlawfully in giving approval for the 100m high turbines at Réidh na nDoirí, Ballingeary.

Solicitor for the residents, Joe Noonan, said the judge ruled that the grid connection was clearly an integral part of the overall development, and that the turbines and the grid connection could not be assessed separately.

Assessing the elements separately is known as ‘project splitting’.

‘Project splitting in itself demonstrates a flaw in the planning process or the Environmental Impact Assessment process which clearly wasn’t conducted at all,’ Mr Green said.

The issue of project splitting hadn’t really been challenged in the High Court before, Mr Green added, paying tribute to the Mr Noonan and his team.

Mr Noonanm of Noonan Linehan Carroll Coffey solicitors said there had been a rush to permit wind power generation plants in quiet rural areas across the country. ‘Rushed planning is bad planning and that can cause serious harm to people. New planning guidelines for industrial wind turbines are long overdue. Meanwhile, communities and private individuals have the worry and expense of taking court action to protect their homes and their way of life. Planning policy is unbalanced. Policy makers need to think again.’

The group has yet to be de-briefed by the legal team on the judgment and the significance of the decision, both locally or nationally. ‘I guess project splitting is an issue that affects most energy planning applications so how that falls down in individual cases differs from one to the next,’ Mr Green said. Speaking of the residents’ three-year campaign, Mr Green added that it was simply a matter of putting heads together and in fact wasn’t that difficult.

A lot of people in the Upper Lee Valley are deeply concerned about the policies that have been brought to bear on the area, he added.

‘A significant amount of planning applications that have been put in for windfarms around Lough Allua and the Upper Lee Valley in general, so there’s a great fear that the whole area is going to be overrun,’ Mr Green said.

Refering to the cost of taking on the State in such a matter, he said: ‘When you break it down between a lot of people it’s not that expensive.’ About €60,000 was raised between family and friends, he estimated.

A further sitting of the High Court on January 14 will go through both the judgment and costs.

Source:  By Catherine Ketch | The Southern Star | www.southernstar.ie

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon