[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm folly  

Credit:  The Scotsman | 19 December 2014 | www.scotsman.com ~~

Alan Black (Letters, 18 December) will be pleased to know that David Cameron shares his view that subsidies for onshore wind should be stopped, and told a 
liaison committee of MPs as much on Tuesday.

How ironic will it be if Scotland’s scenery is saved by Tories in Westminster? One would think a Tory Party would be fully behind a policy that only benefits the rich and powerful 
landowners in this country.

You would think the Green Party would not be in favour of an industry that destroys scenery, ancient peat bogs, kills birds and bats, uses concrete like there was no tomorrow and needs so much quarried stone.

One wind farm was calculated to need as much stone as a wall the height of the outer Berlin wall stretching 600 miles.

One would think the Labour Party would be against an industry where every single household, regardless of income, has to pay a subsidy from their electricity bill to foreign companies and landowners and yet they started all this and give no indication to date that they have changed their tune.

The pleasure of looking at unspoilt scenery is free, and you would think a party claiming to be for the common man would have protected this right.

The strangest thing of all is that, having put in their election manifesto in 2007 that wind farms would be mainly offshore, a nationalist government should have destroyed so much of this country’s greatest asset – its 
scenery.

Celia Hobbs

Peebles Road

Penicuik

Source:  The Scotsman | 19 December 2014 | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: