[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Appeal lodged for Caithness turbines  

Credit:  By David Kerr | The Press and Journal | 9 December 2014 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

An energy company has launched another bid to build a windfarm in Caithness that attracted hundreds of people opposed to the project.

Spittal Hill Windfarm’s plan was rejected by Highland Council earlier this year but now have appealed the decision to the Scottish Government.

If successful seven turbines each 328ft high could be built at the site.

The scheme also required more than 1.2miles of new access tracks and upgrades to more than 2.5miles of existing tracks.

The windfarm had attracted a significant level of comments with more than 1,700 people writing to Highland Council concerning the application.

Of those, about 1,150 opposed the development, while 580 were in support.

Objectors raised issues about the cumulative impact and adverse impact on residents. There was also concern about nearby sites of scientific interest.

Supporters, however, said that there is a need for green energy and the windfarm would provide jobs.

Anti windfarm campaigner Stuart Young, said that the campaign against turbines at Spittal Hill had been ongoing for 12 years.

Previous plans for a 30 turbine development were thrown out by the Scottish Government following a public inquiry.

Mr Young said: “I think it’s disgraceful that developers can keep on putting people through these kind of things.

“This is stretching the situation to a ridiculous degree. People have been fighting against windfarms here for such a long time but the developers keep on coming back to try and make their money.”

He added: “I’m disappointed but I’m not necessarily surprised by it all.”

Highland Council rejected the proposal under delegated powers – meaning it was turned down by planners before it even reached a committee.

In his report, senior planner Ken McCorquodale said there would be a cumulative impact on motorists on the A882 road because of the number of turbines.

He also noted there would be “significantly detrimental” effects from Cooper’s Hill and Dunnet Hill because the windfarm would expand the Causey-mire cluster.

Source:  By David Kerr | The Press and Journal | 9 December 2014 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.