Town, Deepwater Wind assign option to National Grid; Grants project with ‘easement’ to install cable
Credit: By Cassius Shuman | The Block Island Times | Nov 29, 2014 | block-island.villagesoup.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
In what was supposed to be a simple sign off of an option agreement turned into a contentious back and forth between First Warden Kim Gaffett and Town Councilor Chris Warfel over the Deepwater Wind project.
Warfel read a prepared statement filled with words such as “collusion” … “half-rate assessment” … “foolish to pursue” … “tarnishing the viewshed” … “Wall Street” … “ignorant actions” leveled primarily at Gaffett and the town. He also said that Block Island could have come up with a better “intelligent power” alternative than the wind farm project.
“I disagree with those statements that were read into the record,” said Cliff McGinnes, co-owner of the Block Island Power Co. “That’s individual comments. That’s the way an individual has the right to feel. But, I don’t feel that it represents all of the majority of taxpayers on Block Island.”
“I agree with those sentiments,” said Gaffett, referring to what McGinnes said, not Warfel’s comments.
Gaffett then moved the meeting along by making a motion to authorize signing of the Deepwater Wind option agreement, and Councilor Norris Pike seconded the motion.
The Town Council agreed 4-to-1, with Warfel dissenting, to assign its joint option agreement with Deepwater Wind for the BITS component (Block Island Transmission System) of the Block Island wind farm project to state utility National Grid at a noon meeting on Tuesday, Nov. 25. Under the terms of their option agreement Deepwater Wind sent “written notice” to the town prior to the meeting expressing interest in exercising the option.
In the written notice dated Nov. 10, 2014 from Project Manager, Bryan Wilson, to the Town Council Wilson referenced Section 9 of the option agreement: “Further to our conversation, Deepwater hereby requests the Town’s consent to assign the Option to the Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid, a Rhode Island corporation.”
The option was supposed to signed off at the last Town Council meeting on Nov. 19, but the Town Council wanted its lawyers to fully vet the agreement to ensure protections of the ‘fiber use’ stated in the agreement.
“Both lawyers agree that our interests are completely protected,” said Gaffett. “Most of it had to do with ‘use’ protection – to make sure we [the Town of New Shoreham] were protected.”
After the vote, Warfel bolted from the room. McGinnes congregated with Wilson.
“This is great,” said Wilson during an interview with The Block Island Times. “We’re moving forward with the project. The project is under construction. Soon we will be ordering the cable.”
In language from the Aug. 29, 2012 option agreement executed between Deepwater Wind and the Town of New Shoreham, for $1,000 the Town granted Deepwater Wind Block Island Transmission, LLC, its successors and assigns with the non-exclusive option to acquire certain temporary and permanent easements. By definition an easement is defined as a right to cross or otherwise use someone else’s land for a specified purpose.
In exercising the option, the town and Deepwater Wind have executed the ‘Grant of Easement’ to National Grid for purposes of ‘ingress’ and ‘egress’ to the ‘Easement Area,’ and underground electrical cables and associated facilities, including transmission lines, underground duct banks, and one manhole to connect the Block Island Transmission System with the mainland.
In simpler terms, and for all that is defined legally within the agreement, the option acknowledges that Deepwater Wind, and more specifically National Grid, are moving forward with the wind farm project and beginning the process of installing the cable. The cable will be laid beneath three miles of state waters and eight miles of federal waters.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
|Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding