[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

$650 Million Deal; Elwood, Ind. Wind Farm SOLD  

Credit:  Saturday, November 29, 2014, madisoncountyalert.com ~~

$6 Million in Local Property Tax Abatement Benefits; $650 Million Deal —

The Madison County ALERT is first to report that E.ON Climate and Renewables has agreed to sell 80% of its ownership in the Elwood, Ind. wind farm to Enbridge, Inc., a Canadian energy delivery company.

The Dusseldorf, Germany based E.ON is the world’s largest electric utility, generating over $165 billion in revenues last year. E.ON began acquiring land rights in northern Madison County, eastern Tipton County, and southern Grant County nearly four years ago in preparation to build its 8,500 acre, mega windmill farm near Elwood. The farm became operational in late 2012 with 126 turbines.

According to the deal, Enbridge will pay E.ON $650 million for an 80% majority ownership interest in the Elwood farm and one also in Texas. The Elwood Wildcat location generates 202 MW of electricity and the Magic Valley wind farm near Harligen, Texas generates 203 MW.

During 2011, E.ON requested local property tax abatements from Madison, Tipton, and Grant counties, saying local tax abatements were needed to make the project viable. The Kokomo Tribune quoted Andy Melka, assistant development manager for E.ON saying “The tax abatement is necessary for the project to move forward.”

Approval of E.ON’s tax abatement requests became the subject of community debate in Madison and Tipton counties. E.ON failed to receive unanimous approval in either county. Funding for local schools is the largest recipient of property tax money.

In Madison County, E.ON pushed for and received the maximum tax abatement of over $6 million in a 4-3 vote before the Madison County Council.

According to THB at the time, then Council President, Larry Crenshaw (R) joined the Democrat council minority to approve the maximum abatement amount. When Councilman David McCartney (R) requested the vote be delayed for the council to conduct more research, Crenshaw charged that McCartney “hadn’t done his homework.”

THB reported that then Council Vice-President, Mike Phipps (R) said there are three standards to be looked at when considering abatement: job creation or retention; amount of income tax increase the project brings; and the increase in taxable assessed property value. He said the project failed on two of those three. “If E.ON doesn’t come, someone else will,” Phipps said at the time. “This is the ideal place for wind energy. I’m not going to second guess what they may or may not do if they don’t get the abatement, I just think if they choose not to come, someone else will.”

“It is a $6 million abatement, and taxpayers are going to see three permanent jobs and less than $15,000 in an increase to local income tax collection,” Phipps said. “You can’t justify the maximum abatement they requested.”

On Friday, E.ON said in a statement announcing the deal that “The two wind farms are located in areas with favorable wind regimes.” Eckhard Rummler, CEO of E.ON Climate said: “Thanks to our excellent project portfolio and our capabilities, there is a vital demand in the market for assets built and operated by E.ON.”

Summary by the Numbers:

  • E.ON sells 80% ownership interest in Elwood wind farm
  • Madison County tax abatement granted – $6.1 Million
  • Total sales price for 80% of Elwood and Texas sites —$650 Million
  • E.ON Elwood Estimated Construction Cost – $175-$200 Million
  • E.ON worldwide sales during 2013 – $169 Billion
  • Permanent jobs created in Madison and Tipton counties – 3
Source:  Saturday, November 29, 2014, madisoncountyalert.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.