[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy industry protests bird-kill fine; Ohio House passes legislation 

Credit:  By Jim Provance, Blade Columbus Bureau Chief | The Blade | Saturday, 11/22/2014 | www.toledoblade.com ~~

COLUMBUS – Ohio’s fledgling wind energy industry is balking at a largely ignored provision of a massive environmental bill overwhelmingly approved in the House this week, arguing it is designed to throw one more wrench into its turbines.

The language would allow the state Department of Natural Resources to impose additional fees on wind farms based on the killing and injury, or “take,” of wild animals, a broad restriction the wind industry maintains would not be imposed on its competitors.

“No other state in the country has done that,” said Dayna Baird Payne, a lobbyist representing the American Wind Energy Association. “Some have done it for threatened and endangered species.”

She argued that the wind industry could be penalized for the deaths of common crows and other birds, squirrels, and chipmunks when a similar mandate isn’t placed on solar and other renewable energy sources.

“It’s laughable at best,” she said. “It’s certainly unfair. It’s like saying only drivers in purple cars need a ‘take’ permit when they run over a squirrel.”

House Bill 490, sponsored by Reps. Dave Hall (R., Millersburg) and Andy Thompson (R., Marietta), is a sweeping bill.

It includes measures to reduce runoff of toxic algae-fueling phosphorus from farmland into Ohio waterways. It adjusts penalties associated with the disposal of brine from hydraulic fracturing operations, and makes it easier for telecommunications companies to back away from their commitment to basic phone land-line service in favor of broadband and wireless alternatives.

The bill passed the House by a vote of 73-20, with the support of nearly all of the northwest Ohio delegation. It now goes to the Senate, with the expectation that it will reach Gov. John Kasich’s desk before lawmakers end the two-year session in mid-December.

ODNR requested the wind “take” provision as a follow-up to a 2012 energy law that, among other things, authorized the department to develop a “take” fee program for all energy producers. The language added to House Bill 490, however, only applies to the wind sector.

Wind power and environmental advocates see the provision as one more obstacle the state has thrown into the path of the development of wind farms in recent years.

A provision was enacted earlier this year that increased mandatory property setback distances for the siting of wind turbines. Mr. Kasich also signed into law a two-year halt on the state’s mandate that electric utilities find at least 25 percent of their power from renewable and advanced energy sources by 2025.

“[Wind] is where we’re noticing the takes,” ODNR spokesman Bethany McCorkle said. “We have proven numbers.”

She said other energy industries face such permitting regulations, such as when stream pollution leads to a fish kill.

The department would develop rules as to how the permitting fees would be applied, with the goal of encouraging wind farms to take steps to mitigate their impact on wildlife, such as changing the speed of turbines during bird migrating season, she said.

“It will be done on a case-by-case basis,” Ms. McCorkle said. “We’ll factor in location and timing.”

Rep. Tony Burkley (R., Payne), whose district includes major wind farms in Paulding and Van Wert counties, found the term “wild animal” to be too broad. He prepared an amendment to remove the language, but other energy producers balked. They feared reverting to the 2012 law would also capture them in the “take” permit net.

Mr. Hall has agreed to work with him to address the issue in the Senate.

“My district has received quite a bit of benefit from the wind industry, not only for the county but also the school districts and landowners,” he said. “I didn’t want to see that come to an end or make it more difficult for them to be in Ohio.”

Source:  By Jim Provance, Blade Columbus Bureau Chief | The Blade | Saturday, 11/22/2014 | www.toledoblade.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon