[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Navitus Bay plan is “unlawful”, council tells hearing  

Credit:  By Melanie Vass | Bournemouth Echo | 20 November 2014 | www.bournemouthecho.co.uk ~~

Bournemouth council claimed Navitus Bay’s “Plan B” was “unlawful” at the first of a series of issue-specific hearings.

The finer details of the wind farm plans are currently being examined at a number of in-depth hearings, which will continue this week and next week.

The first of these saw Bournemouth council argue the “mitigation option” put forward by Navitus Bay Development Limited (NBDL) earlier this month should not be considered as part of the current examination process.

This option would see no more than 105 turbines built at least 11 miles from shore – a significant reduction on its primary proposal of up to 194 turbines around nine miles from shore at Swanage and 13 from Bournemouth and Poole.

A QC speaking on behalf of the council argued the amended scheme constituted a material change and should be subject to separate consultation and examination process.

The view of the council, and of council leader John Beesley, is that it was unfair of Navitus Bay Deve,opment Limited to submit the new scheme at such a late stage and that it had not given them sufficient time to respond.

Cllr Beesley said later: “We maintain that there are currently no grounds for the Secretary of State to consider Plan B as an amendment to the current proposed wind farm.

“To justify doing so would require there to have been a technical change which led to a change in the development. All the changes made by Navitus Bay, however, relate to existing technology or data.

“If Navitus Bay wants a new scheme to be considered then it should submit a new development consent order and environmental statement.

“The detail of the new ‘mitigation option’ has only been available for a matter of days and it would be enormously difficult to adequately consider Plan B while the current DCO is being examined.”

After hearing from both sides, the examination panel said it would proceed with Plan A, but would also consider Plan B.

Other issues discussed on the first day included offshore cable installation, air quality and water quality. The hearings are being held at the Dorchester Suite of the Highcliff Marriott Hotel, St Michael’s Road.

The panel will continue to sit today and Friday if required, before recommencing next Tuesday until Friday as required.

Source:  By Melanie Vass | Bournemouth Echo | 20 November 2014 | www.bournemouthecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.