LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windfarm restrictions have ‘crippled’ the industry, says Daniel Andrews 

The state planning minister, Matthew Guy, said Labor’s plan was a disaster and “a risk to all of those people in regional Victoria who live anywhere near a hill”. “Daniel Andrews is taking planning power away from communities that this government gave power back to four years ago,” he said.

Credit:  Michael Safi | The Guardian | Thursday 13 November 2014 | www.theguardian.com ~~

Victoria’s tough restrictions on windfarms have “crippled the industry” and would be eased under a state Labor government, the opposition leader, Daniel Andrews, has announced.

Buffer zones allowing homeowners living within 2km of a proposed windfarm to veto the project – part of a suite of wind-energy restrictions introduced by the Coalition after the last election – had “driven wind energy into the ground and driven investment out of our state,” Andrews said on Thursday.

Just two windfarms have been approved in Victoria since the buffer zones were introduced in 2011, compared with 29 in the decade prior.

Clean energy groups say the limits are arbitrary and should be scrapped altogether, but Andrews said reducing them to 1km was “balance and a fair outcome”. He said Victoria could become a world leader in wind energy “if only we can get the settings right”.

A minimum 5km limit on windfarms near state and national parks and areas of state significance, such as Hanging Rock in central Victoria, would be retained under the Labor plan.

Power to grant windfarm applications – which the Coalition passed to local councils – would be handed back to the planning minister under the scheme.

Labor’s planning spokesman, Brian Tee, said councils would still play “an important role” monitoring compliance with noise restrictions and “identifying critical landscapes and environments” where turbines might be banned.

Labor would also keep blanket bans on windfarms along the Great Ocean road, the Mornington Peninsula, the Macedon Ranges and dozens of other sites the Coalition has declared no-go zones.

But Tee said exceptions would be carved out for “smaller scale” projects where “community involvement could be demonstrated”, including a three-turbine windfarm in the marginal seat of Macedon, which residents have been agitating to build for six years.

Ralf Thesing, the president of the group behind the proposal, the Macedon Ranges Sustainability Group, said the windfarm would power “thousands of households” in Woodend, Mount Macedon and the Macedon Ranges.

The state planning minister, Matthew Guy, said Labor’s plan was a disaster and “a risk to all of those people in regional Victoria who live anywhere near a hill”.

“Daniel Andrews is taking planning power away from communities that this government gave power back to four years ago,” he said.

Friends of the Earth said the Labor announcement was a “welcome step”, but their renewable energy spokesman, Leigh Ewbank, called on Labor to go further.

“If Labor is serious about wind energy development, they will have to dump the blanket bans on windfarms in the places such as the Macedon Ranges,” he said. “Labor’s pledge to exempt community-initiated projects from windfarm restrictions is sensible policy. Yet the blanket bans on windfarms still prohibit commercial projects that enjoy strong community support.”

Source:  Michael Safi | The Guardian | Thursday 13 November 2014 | www.theguardian.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky