LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Sleepless concerns prevent wind farm decision 

Credit:  Peeblesshire News | 11 Nov 2014 | www.peeblesshirenews.com ~~

Members of Scottish Borders Council’s planning committee have delayed making a decision on a wind farm extension – to allow a former Lord Lieutenant get some sleep.

Power company Infinis wants to add a further six 100-metre high turbines to its Glenkerie Wind Farm, near Broughton.

The existing 11 turbines went live in February, 2012. The company believes that the high wind-speeds recorded on the rural Tweeddale hillsides are ideal for further turbines.

But this week’s planning meeting was told that the extension plans will see the wind farm encroach into a neighbouring valley. And that one of the proposed turbines will be positioned only 900 metres from the home of former Tweeddale Lord Lieutenant, Sir David Younger.

Lady Pamela Strachan, who is the wife of the current Lord Lieutenant Sir Hew Strachan, delivered a damning verdict against the application during Monday’s meeting.

She said: “Sir David Younger did not want to object to the application due to the fact that he was Lord Lieutenant at the time. The nearest of these turbines will be only 900 metres from his home. The noise from these turbines will be terrible during the night.”

Lady Strachan also hit out at the footprint of the Glenkerie Wind Farm breaking into the Glenholm Valley. And she claimed the six new turbines would be much more visible.

Lady Strachan added: “In contrast the turbines that are already there, these will be 110 metres higher and will be a great intrusion on the valley.

“The current wind farm is between 100 and 200 metres below the hill line – this cannot be said of the extension.”

Planning officers admitted the site is sensitive due to its proximity to an Uplands Special Landscape Area.

But they believed it was acceptable within their planning policies – and recommended members of the committee approve the application.

Jedburgh councillor Jim Brown was supportive of the additional turbines but expressed his concerns about the noise. He said: “The turbines themselves are well contained although I appreciate local residents will have a different view.

“I do have concerns about the noise. I hope we can do something to help the residents of Glenkirk get some sleep at night.

“I hope we can do some micro-siting and help Mr Younger.”

Kelso councillor Simon Mountford also expressed concern over the noise. He stated: “If it wasn’t for Glenkirk I don’t think we would have an argument.”

A total of 23 objections were tabled by residents.

And both Upper Tweed Community Council and the Manor, Stobo and Lyne Community Council opposed the extension. Selkirkshire councillor Michaelle Ballantyne added: “There is an issue with noise and I am deeply concerned about the turbines which are closest to the residential properties.”

Members of the committee agreed to continue the application until next month for talks to place with Infinis about moving the closest two turbines to Glenkirk.

Source:  Peeblesshire News | 11 Nov 2014 | www.peeblesshirenews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky