[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Hearings set on high-voltage transmission project 

Credit:  CHRIS HUBBUCH | Coulee News | November 6, 2014 | lacrossetribune.com ~~

Wisconsin regulators have announced dates in December for public hearings on a proposed high-voltage transmission line to connect La Crosse and Madison.

The hearings, scheduled between Dec. 8 and 15, will be the last opportunity for the public to testify in person for the record that regulators will use in ruling on whether the project is approved and if so what route the lines should follow.

Concerned citizens can submit written comments to the Public Service Commission through Jan. 5.

A joint venture of Xcel Energy and American Transmission Co., the 345-kilovolt Badger-Coulee line would run from a substation under construction on Briggs Road in Holmen to the outskirts of Madison.

The lines would follow one of two general routes through the Coulee Region: north through Holmen to Black River Falls and along the Interstate 94 corridor; or west through Onalaska and West Salem and across Monroe County to the interstate.

ATC and Excel say the line, which would tie in to another high-voltage project now being built between Hampton, Minn., and Holmen, would improve system reliability, deliver cheaper power for Wisconsin consumers and provide a pipeline for wind energy from Minnesota and Iowa to population centers to the east.

Wisconsin ratepayers would pay a share of the estimated $540 million to $580 million price tag.

The PSC is expected to release a final environmental review Tuesday of the potential impact.

Opponents of the project complain the draft review did not adequately address cultural, health and economic impacts of the project, nor did it do what more than 90 municipalities and a dozen lawmakers had asked: to provide a cost-benefit analysis of other alternatives such as energy efficiency and local power generation.

“It was grossly inadequate,” said Deb Severson, a representative of Citizens Energy Task Force, one of the intervenors in the case. “There were issues totally ignored.”

Installing solar panels to meet half a home’s energy needs would save a homeowner $20,000 over the course of the project’s 40-year lifetime, said Rob Danielson, spokesman for Save Our Unique Lands, one of several citizens groups opposing the project. Danielson said there are another $20,000 in savings from increased energy efficiency.

“Those are all economic benefits,” he said. “There’s no detractions.”

The project, informally proposed in 2010, has generated letters, comments and resolutions from about 100 units of government, including La Crosse County, the city of Onalaska and village of Holmen, which have either opposed the project or routes through their borders.

The PSC has since logged more than 200 public comments on the draft environmental review.

It will be up to the three-member Public Service Commission to determine whether the project is necessary and serves the public interest. The commission can approve, deny or modify the proposal and will select the route if the project is approved.

A final decision is expected in April following testimony from applicants, 25 registered intervenors, and the public.

At the federal level, the project would need permits from the Fish and Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers, Natural Resource Conservation Service, National Park Service and Federal Aviation Administration.

Source:  CHRIS HUBBUCH | Coulee News | November 6, 2014 | lacrossetribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky