[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Planning inspector to rule on controversial Somerby wind turbine proposal after applicant appeals 

Credit:  Melton Times | 06 November 2014 | www.meltontimes.co.uk ~~

A planning appeal challenging Melton Council’s decision to refuse permission for a 200ft high wind turbine to be built in Somerby gets underway later this month.

At a meeting in June Melton Council’s planning committee voted narrowly in favour (four votes to three) of a recommendation to refuse plans to erect the turbine on land at Southfields Farm in Church Lane.

The committee gave four grounds for refusal, the fourth being that ‘the proposed turbine would give rise to an unacceptable risk of harm to the health of a local resident’ – specifically relating to an autistic child.

But applicants Mark and Jane Barnes claimed the report by an independent medical specialist was ‘fundamentally flawed’ as it ‘had relied on false assumptions’.

Despite villagers’ overwhelming objections the planning committee had previously voted in favour of the turbine, in January, but it reconsidered the application in June after being asked to consider new information relating to the proposal – the key piece being the turbine’s potential impact upon the health of the autistic child.

Now the application will be decided by a planning inspector after Mr Barnes lodged an appeal.

This week it was confirmed the appeal will be decided on the basis of an informal hearing to be held at Melton Council’s Parkside offices on Wednesday, November 19 at 10am.

The planning committee meeting in January heard that the council had received more than 500 written objections to the turbine proposal from more than 300 homes. Objectors’ concerns included the turbine being ‘an intrusive presence for miles around’ and it having a detrimental impact upon the landscape as well as nearby equestrian businesses and residents.

But the applicants claimed the proposed site had ‘no special landscape designation’, that there were ‘no legitimate planning reasons to refuse the application’ and that the turbine would ‘only directly affect three houses’.

Source:  Melton Times | 06 November 2014 | www.meltontimes.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon