[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Controversial Highland wind farm developer wins met mast appeal  

Credit:  Written by Laurence Ford | Highland News | 06/11/2014 | www.highland-news.co.uk ~~

A wind farm developer has won an appeal against Highland Council and has been granted permission to erect an 80-metre high temporary meteorological mast near Beauly.

However, the reporter declined to award ABO Wind UK Ltd costs for the appeal for the mast adjacent to the controversial proposed Allt Carach Wind Farm.

ABO is investigating the potential for a wind farm located in the Kilmorack Community Council area, southwest of Beauly, which has attracted considerable opposition in the area.

The proposed development would be located on land owned by the Breakachy, Erchless and Farley Estates.

In March, the German developers submitted a planning application to erect the temporary 80m high meteorological mast near Urchany and Farley Forest on the Farley Estate that will collect reliable wind and other metrological data that will help to evaluate the potential for the site for wind farm development.

But the application was knocked back by the Highland Council’s South Planning Applications Committee in May on grounds that the height and elevated position of the mast would have a detrimental impact on the landscape and scenery and on individual and community residential amenity.

The committee’s decision overturned the recommendation of the council’s planning officer that the application should be approved as the temporary met mast would “have very little impact on the surrounding landscape or amenity of nearby residents”.

Following the appeal decision, ABO Wind project manager Tom Harrison said: “We are relieved at the outcome as the purpose of the met mast is solely to assess whether this site is viable for a wind farm.

“It was unreasonable of the council to reject our planning application in the first instance and by going to appeal we have proved the council’s decision was wrong.”

Commenting on the decision not to award expenses for the appeal, he said: “Naturally we are disappointed that our appeal for expenses has been rejected given that it has been determined that we should have been granted approval for this met mast back in May. Though we had always intended to donate the expenses to charity, we believe the award of expenses would have sent a clear message to the council.

“The purpose of the met mast, which is a temporary structure is to identify if this site is suitable. If the met data suggest a wind farm could be viable, we will use the data to design the best possible wind farm for that site.”

Source:  Written by Laurence Ford | Highland News | 06/11/2014 | www.highland-news.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.