Please take a minute to help keep us online.
To preserve our independence, we are not funded by any political or industry groups, and we do not host ads. Wind Watch relies entirely on user donations, every penny of which goes directly to keeping the web site running.
Stripe:  |
PayPal/Venmo:  |
Indigenous elder calls for ‘face-to-face’ discussions over proposed Silverton Wind Farm
Credit: By Gavin Coote | ABC News | October 24, 2014 | www.abc.net.au ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A far-west New South Wales Indigenous elder wants assurances a proposed wind farm development won’t impact Aboriginal artefacts in the Silverton area, west of Broken Hill.
The wind farm’s developer, AGL, last night held its first community meeting in seven months to talk with residents.
The project is still stalled while the future of the renewable energy target remains uncertain.
At the meeting Broken Hill Local Aboriginal Land Council chairwoman, Maureen O’Donnell, raised concerns with AGL about the preservation of local cultural artefacts.
She said the company should hold face-to-face discussions with traditional owners.
“I don’t like letters, I like to talk face to face, I’ve said that in there I’ll say it again,” she said.
“They should acknowledge the Aboriginal people and the traditional owners and make it their business to come and talk to us.
“I’m concerned for the country, I don’t know much about wind farms I must admit. Whether they’re a good thing or not, I am concerned about my country.”
Ms O’Donnell said her mother grew up on a station in the region and that all parts of the Broken Hill region are culturally important to the Barkindji and Wilyakali people – something she believed AGL needed to recognise.
“[AGL] haven’t been talking to us much and we’ve got a lot of catching up to do,” she said.
“But they gave a commitment today at this meeting to talk to us because there’s a lot of sites out there and I’m concerned that they just get destroyed.”
Silverton residents remained concerned about the proximity of the proposed wind turbines to the township, and were calling for AGL to commit to a six kilometre buffer zone.
AGL has been contacted for comment.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=67584 ]
