LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Regulations for windmills could prevent bat deaths 

Credit:  Washington Post | October 14, 2014 | www.washingtonpost.com ~~

Regarding the Oct. 13 news article “A deadly one-two punch for bats: Windmills and disease”:

It is especially important that we minimize all human causes of bat mortality if these incredibly beneficial creatures are to stand a chance of survival. Commercial wind turbines cause an estimated 900,000 bat deaths per year, making wind turbines the second-biggest killer of bats, after white-nose syndrome. Nearly all turbine deaths are avoidable.

Recent studies showed that up to 93 percent of bat deaths could be prevented if wind turbine operators changed the wind speed at which the blades start moving. More than 800,000 bats could be saved with a minuscule drop in electrical energy production. Despite the strong recommendation from some U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff that this solution be regulatory, the agency instead offered it as a voluntary suggestion. Not surprisingly, very few wind companies have implemented this solution.

Bats eat insects that otherwise would destroy crops and that carry diseases that affect humans. Without bats, farmers would have to use more pesticides, resulting in higher food prices and more damage to our soil and water.

Requiring the industry to implement an easy solution to reduce bat deaths, benefiting crop production and consumers, isn’t unreasonable.

Albert M. Manville II, Falls Church

The writer is a retired wildlife biologist for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Source:  Washington Post | October 14, 2014 | www.washingtonpost.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky