[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Controversial wind turbines turned down by commitee 

Credit:  Northumberland Gazette | 12 October 2014 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk ~~

A controversial windfarm bid, near to an existing six turbines, was rejected by the council’s planning committee this week.

At Tuesday night’s meeting, the five-turbine Rayburn Lake windfarm near Netherwitton, which had been recommended for refusal, was turned down by councillors.

RES UK and Ireland Ltd’s bid for five 127-metre-high turbines between Wingates and Netherwitton had sparked 159 objections from residents and three from parish councils.

The planning officer pointed out that the turbines at the nearby Wingates windfarm are 110-metres-tall, while even the Cramlington turbines are three metres shorter at 124-metres-to-blade-tip.

Speaking on behalf of objectors, John Trevelyan, vice-chairman of Netherwitton Parish Council, said: “Many locals are fearful of the cumulative impact if this proposal were to go ahead.

“Northumberland has already met its renewables target.”

He also referred to the impact the windfarm would have on the grade I-listed Netherwitton Hall, saying it would ‘create an unacceptable scar’.

A representative of RES attempted to point out the weaknesses in some of the proposed reasons for refusal, including that it was unclear from where the officer’s conclusions were drawn. He also highlighted the benefits, saying the windfarm would boost the regional economy by £1.4million.

But the committee was happy to follow officer advice and refuse the application.

Coun Trevor Thorne said: “I think all five reasons are good and would stand up to scrutiny.”

Source:  Northumberland Gazette | 12 October 2014 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky