[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Conserve ‘the jewel in the crown of Northumberland’  

Credit:  Northumberland Gazette | 12 October 2014 | ~~

A proposed windfarm, which would have a ‘disastrous impact’ on a ‘lovely landscape’, has been thrown out by councillors this week.

At Tuesday night’s meeting of Northumberland County Council’s planning and environment committee, the Belford Burn scheme was recommended for refusal.

Energiekontor UK Ltd’s proposals for nine 100-metre turbines on land to the west of Belford had sparked 500 objections, while Belford Parish Council and five other neighbouring parishes had also expressed concerns.

Four speakers reinforced the reasons for opposing the scheme with Chris Craddock, chairman of the Middleton Burn Action Group, which has been fighting this scheme for more than two years, highlighting three reasons for refusal ‘from many’.

He said the scheme would do ‘substantial harm to the Belford conservation area’ and would do ‘serious harm to an iconic landscape which was described in this chamber by the late Coun John Taylor as a jewel in the crown of Northumberland’.

Finally, Mr Craddock added that the scheme ‘would, in the bigger picture, generate only a trifling amount of electricity’.

Barbara Hooper, from the National Trust, explained that the Trust was ‘extremely concerned about the impact of this proposal on our properties’, including Lindisfarne Castle, the Farne Islands and the viewpoint at Ros Castle.

Next to speak was the chairman of the parish council, Brenda Stanton, who urged the committee ‘to protect this unique and beautiful part of Northumberland and the local economy’, citing the importance of tourism since the village has been bypassed by the A1.

Ward councillor John Woodman agreed with all that had gone before, but emphasised the ‘quality and importance of the landscape’ as the most important reason for refusal.

Michael Briggs, from Energiekontor, tried to highlight some of the benefits of the development, including the fact that the windfarm would produce 90 gigawatt hours of electricity per year, equivalent to 15 per cent of Northumberland’s annual domestic energy consumption.

“This windfarm would punch well above its weight in terms of the amount of renewable energy it would be able to produce,” he said.

He also mentioned the community benefit fund of £112,000 per year and the £500,000 contribution to the Belford station project, but he failed to convince the committee to go against the planning officer’s advice.

Coun Trevor Thorne moved refusal, saying that he thought Coun Woodman had it right with the key issue being the ‘visual impact on this lovely landscape’, adding: “I think it would have a disastrous impact.”

Coun Milburn Douglas seconded the motion, saying: “Money can’t buy what is at Belford at the moment.”

One of the other reasons for refusal was due that the windfarm would have ‘an adverse effect on the safe operation of Ministry of Defence’s Air Defence Radar at Brizlee Wood’.

Source:  Northumberland Gazette | 12 October 2014 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter