News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Don’t stick Somerset with turbine salvage costs  

Credit:  October 8, 2014 | www.delmarvanow.com ~~

Regardless of how one feels about industrial wind turbines in Somerset County, there is one detail in the proposed zoning ordinance that will likely require all county residents to pay millions of dollars for the removal of abandoned turbines when they are no longer useful.

This is because the current wording of the proposed zoning regulations for turbines allows the salvage cost of the turbines to be subtracted from the bond the developer is required to post for turbine removal.

Who can predict what the salvage costs of the materials in the turbines will be in 20 years? Some may even be hazardous waste. As it stands now, the county planners will subtract salvage costs from the removal costs to determine the amount of the bond, based on studies by the developer.

And guess what? The developer posts on its website a study that shows salvage costs exceed the cost of dismantling turbines.

This means the bonding could be worthless if predictions of salvage costs are too high. Somerset County could be stuck with paying millions of dollars required to dismantle the turbines – or leave them as a scar on our countryside.

There is a simple fix: Zoning should remove mention of the salvage cost and require the developer to post a bond for 100 percent removal of the turbines. Let the bonding company and developer work out between themselves any subtraction for salvage costs.

No other county that allows industrial turbines subtracts salvage costs from bonding requirements.

Why should Somerset County?

Kathryn Washburn is a retired city planner and U.S. government manager who is familiar with bonding requirements.

Source:  October 8, 2014 | www.delmarvanow.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.