News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Windfarm schemes thrown out  

Credit:  Northumberland Gazette | 07 October 2014 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk ~~

Turbine protesters in Northumberland may feel that the tide has started to turn after two windfarms were thrown out by councillors tonight.

At this evening’s meeting of Northumberland County Council’s planning and environment committee, the nine-turbine Belford Burn scheme and the five-turbine Rayburn Lake windfarm near Netherwitton were both recommended for refusal.

Energiekontor UK Ltd’s proposals for nine 100-metre turbines on land to the west of Belford had sparked 500 objections.

And four speakers reinforced the reasons for opposing the scheme as Chris Craddock, chairman of the Middleton Burn Action Group; Barbara Hooper, from the National Trust; Brenda Stanton, chairman of Belford Parish Council; and ward councillor John Woodman all spoke against the proposal.

Michael Briggs, from Energiekontor, tried to highlight some of the benefits of the development, including the fact that the windfarm would produce 90 gigawatt hours of electricity per year, equivalent to 15 per cent of Northumberland’s annual domestic energy consumption, but he failed to convince the committee to go against the planning officer’s advice.

Referring to the fact that this application was recommended for refusal when many others had been backed by the planning department, Coun Bernard Pidcock said he was ‘happily mystified’.

Meanwhile, RES UK and Ireland Ltd’s bid for five 127-metre-high turbines between Wingates and Netherwitton had been almost as unpopular, sparking 159 objections from residents and three from parish councils.

The planning officer pointed out that the turbines at the nearby Wingates windfarm are 110-metres-tall, while even the Cramlington turbines are three metres shorter at 124-metres-to-blade-tip.

An agent for the applicant attempted to point out the weaknesses in some of the proposed reasons for refusal, but again the committee was happy to follow officer advice and refuse the application.

Source:  Northumberland Gazette | 07 October 2014 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.