[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

So long to wind project  

Credit:  St. Joseph News-Press | September 22, 2014 | www.newspressnow.com ~~

A major proposed project to produce wind energy from towers erected in Holt County, Mo., has come to a sudden halt, and there are lots of folks to thank for that.

Certainly, some in the region will see this as a missed opportunity. After all the developer, Element Power of Portland, Ore., had proposed to erect around 100 wind turbines on 30,000 acres of leased private land.

The company said the project, known as Mill Creek, would require 300 workers during construction and create 12 to 14 permanent jobs. Individual landowners stood to gain for every tower on their property.

This loomed as a substantial boost to an area that has had plenty of economic setbacks, including repeated floods from the Missouri River. But the development also posed unusual risks.

Conservationists rallied to challenge the project as unwise due to the potential for harming some of Holt County’s biggest attributes – its standing as a flight path stopover for thousands of migratory birds and as host to a world-class birding sanctuary, Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge.

These ecological impacts, in turn, could have dealt a damaging blow to the regional businesses and communities that depend on the influx of refuge visitors and outdoor enthusiasts.

For our part, we always felt uneasy about this proposal but joined with others in wanting to defer to the experts. The problem, however, is government oversight of wind farm developers is limited, meaning expert opinions carry less weight.

In the end, Element Power withdrew the project rather than try to scale back operations to meet conservationists’ compelling arguments. The company said it could comply with requests to minimize the impact to wildlife, including by turning off the turbines during periods of heavy migration, but such steps would reduce the return on its investment.

A number of supporters of wildlife and the refuge argued for this ending – either no turbine project, or one modified to address reasonable concerns. From the Missouri Department of Conservation to the various birding and wildlife advocates who spoke up, there is plenty of credit to be passed around.

Source:  St. Joseph News-Press | September 22, 2014 | www.newspressnow.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.