[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Caithness windfarm rejected by planners  

Credit:  By Jane Candlish | The Press and Journal | 18 September 2014 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Proposals for a windfarm in Caithness have been turned down by council planners.

The Spittal Hill project would have included seven turbines on land to the east of Spittal Hill.

Each of the devices would have been 328ft high.

The scheme also required more than 1.2miles of new access tracks and upgrades to more than 2.5miles of existing tracks.

The windfarm had attracted a significant level of comments – more than 1,700 people wrote to Highland Council concerning the application.

Of those around 1,150 opposed the development, while around 580 were in support.

Objectors raised issues about the cumulative impact and adverse impact on residents. There was also concern about nearby sites of special scientific interest.

Supporters, however, said that there is a need for green energy and that the windfarm would provide jobs.

But using their delegated powers, council planners have turned down the plans, brought forward by Spittal Hill Windfarm Ltd.

No one from the company was available for comment.

It is understood that the land is owned by

In his report, planner Ken McCorquodale said that there would be a cumulative impact on motorists on the A882 road because of the number of turbines.

Also that there would be “significantly detrimental” effects from Cooper’s Hill and Dunnet Hill because the windfarm would expand the Causeymire cluster.

Mr McCorquodale also raised concerns about the visual effects on the community of Spittal from the proposed development, existing turbines and consented schemes at Halsary, Bad A Cheo and Achlachan.

Source:  By Jane Candlish | The Press and Journal | 18 September 2014 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.