[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Big blow for Cumbrian turbine plan 

Credit:  By Staff Reporter | News & Star | 12 September 2014 | www.newsandstar.co.uk ~~

Plans to build five 120.5m wind turbines at Haverigg prison in Cumbria have been dealt a blow.

After receiving almost 100 letters of objection from Haverigg residents, Copeland Council planning committee upheld an earlier decision in July to refuse the application.

This was in stark contrast to planning officer John Groves’ recommendation for approval.

The decision was brought before the panel for a second time, because of the planning officer’s recommendation for approval.

The 25-year operation would have been constructed on land belonging to HMP Haverigg on a former airfield adjacent to an existing windfarm.

Reasons against the proposal included the visual impact of the additional turbines, as well as the height, which is almost double of those already installed in the area. Councillors and residents also raised concerns about the welfare of prisoners due to the noise.

Resident Henry Holmes, of North Lane, Haverigg, objected to the proposal.

After Wednesday’s meeting he said: “I am very pleased about the decision. I feel relieved.”

North Lane residents at the meeting produced a 200-strong petition against the wind turbines.

Applicant Partnerships for Renewables had argued the project would have brought more than £5m into the local economy, as well as pledging thousands of pounds in a community fund.

Partnerships for Renewables expressed disappointment at the committee’s decision.

PFR spokesman John Mills said: “We were very disappointed by the committee’s decision, which seems to reflect the views of a few vociferous objectors who attended the committee, rather than the majority of the local community.

“The application promised considerable socio-economic benefits, including millions of pounds of construction work for local businesses. It would have brought a significant economic boost to the area.

“We may appeal the determination, but no decision has yet been taken on that.”

Source:  By Staff Reporter | News & Star | 12 September 2014 | www.newsandstar.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon