[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Lawmakers clash over transparency at wildlife agency  

Credit:  By Timothy Cama | The Hill | 09/10/14 | thehill.com ~~

House Republicans clashed with Democrats Wednesday over what the GOP sees as obstruction by the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) of its investigations.

Democrats used the hearing of the Natural Resources Committee to blast their colleagues for wasting FWS and Interior Department resources with the investigations.

The GOP’s requests over the last year and a half have centered on allegations that the agency enforces bird protection laws on oil and gas companies more zealously than wind energy companies. The panel has also investigated the endangered species listing of a flowering plant.

“Despite the issuance of subpoenas, the department continues to withhold and redact documents,” committee Chairman Doc Hastings (R-Wash.) said. “Even worse, the department is going out of its way to provide even less information to Congress than it is to others.”

Hastings showed some specific examples in which the FWS gave more information to media outlets requesting documents than to committee staff.

“Either the administration is incompetent, or it is going out of its way to expend time and money to withhold information from Congress,” he said.

Rep. Peter DeFazio (Ore.), the panel’s top Democrat, accused Republicans of wasting time and money trying to gin up scandals.

“Here we are again chasing imaginary scandals,” DeFazio said.

He called the investigation a witch hunt and attributed the different disclosures to different staffers processing requests.

“One person redacts documents for one request, and they don’t have the identical person when they have someone else make the request to redact the same documents,” he said. “So you have, yes, inconsistency. Not unreasonable.”

He joked that lawmakers ought to try to drown FWS Director Dan Ashe to determine whether he’s a witch.

The day before the hearing, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell wrote to the panel to say its requests since the beginning of 2013 have netted more than 5,500 documents with only 60,000 pages, costing the department at least $2 million.

Ashe and Democrats repeatedly used those estimates to paint the Republican investigation as unnecessary and wasteful.

“Based on the title you’ve chosen for this hearing, I accept that you remain unsatisfied with our responsiveness,” Ashe said. “And I’ve got to say, that disappoints me. I believe we are making exceptional efforts to be responsive.”

For comparison’s sake, he said his agency spent the same amount of time responding to committee requests as it spent on an elephant poaching investigation that resulted in multiple arrests and more than a ton of illegal ivory being seized.

Republicans weren’t buying it.

“The excuses for the reasons for not being transparent … is either bureaucracy, we’re too busy or it costs too much,” said Rep. John Fleming (R-La.). “The only thing left is ‘the dog ate my homework.’ ”

Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.) speculated that if the FWS were more compliant with the panel’s requests, it would cost less.

“If we were getting straighter answers out of various levels of government, we wouldn’t have to spend as much time on the efforts,” he said.

But Democrats kept at it.

“Americans are sick and tired of the inaction in the United States House of Representatives,” said Rep. Matt Cartwright (D-Pa.) “A big part of what we’re doing that leads to this inaction is drawing up of phony scandals.

Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) apologized to Ashe and Hilary Tompkins, the Interior Department’s top lawyer, for the Republicans’ behavior.

“It’s really embarrassing, frankly, what passes for oversight sometimes around here,” Huffman said. “It does seem to me sometimes that this committee would rather have the issue then get the information.”

Source:  By Timothy Cama | The Hill | 09/10/14 | thehill.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.