[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Fight begins against wind turbine appeal for Nosterfield End  

Credit:  By Debra Fox | Cambridge news | September 10, 2014 | www.cambridge-news.co.uk ~~

Visual impact, noise and effects on residents’ homes are only some of the complaints against plans for a wind turbine.

The turbine, proposed for farmland outside of Haverhill, was refused by councillors in February.

Though the application was recommended for approval, it was refused on the grounds it would have “an adverse impact on the landscape”.

Now, an appeal has been lodged by applicant James Sills, and original complaints are being re-entered.

Mr Sills said: “Our detailed assessments, responses from the expert statutory consultees, and two separate planning officer reports confirmed that this is an acceptable location for a single wind turbine development of this scale.”

Colin Poole, town clerk, has re-entered original complaints on behalf of Haverhill Town Council.

In a letter to Jonathan Alden, of the planning inspectorate, he outlined how the proposed turbine, which would measure 78m from root to tip, would damage the surrounding area.

It would have an impact nearby Hazel Stub, he said, and also effect residents’ enjoyment of their homes and gardens.

The letter said: “The town council is not persuaded by the evidence submitted that noise impact will be insignificant.”

It also noted a previous objections from the National Air Traffic Services (NATS) about an impact on air traffic control, and “anomalies” in measurements identified by residents.

Cllr Julian Flood has argued that its construction is likely to kill a rare species of a bat found near the site, and lower house prices by up to 17 per cent.

Mr Sills added: “We disagree with the position of the planning committee and have chosen to appeal their decision. We look forward to hearing the views of the planning inspector.”

Source:  By Debra Fox | Cambridge news | September 10, 2014 | www.cambridge-news.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.