[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

An essay regarding jobs in Maine and wind power development 

Credit:  Posted by Brad Blake on September 5, 2014 | Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine | www.windtaskforce.org ~~

We frequently see the wind industry’s line about all the jobs they create. I responded to someone tonight and before I knew it, I had written the following essay.

Sir, you have been listening way too much to the wind power industry’s propaganda. They count every possible job related to planning and constructing these projects, however remote that connection may be. Yes, it takes some consultants to draft the application materials, some engineers to plan and lay out the project. Site work is done mostly by local contractors like Maine Drilling & Blasting, Sargent Co., and Reed & Reed brings in its “biggest crane in New England” to hoist the components up into place. Any major construction job of any kind is going to employ these types of contractors.

However, the true employment impact is generation of permanent “new jobs”. The industry standard is approximately one maintenance worker per ten turbines. So that number is minuscule.

To demonstrate my point, let me relate to you the tale of two power projects near Lincoln, Maine. One is Covanta biomass plant in West Enfield; the other Rollins Wind in Lincoln, Lee, Winn, and Burlington. Now, pay attention to the contrast.

Covanta is 25 MW, operating at 80% capacity factor, cranking out 20 MW 24/7/365. Rollins is 60 MW, operating at 24% capacity factor, cranking out 14.4MW intermittently, when the wind blows just right. The grid operator plans on using Covanta power as base load; but due to the unpredictable, unreliable nature of Rollins’ dependency on how the wind blows, it is relegated to surplus.

More contrast: Covanta cost $70 million to build, or $3.5 million per net MW rating; Rollins cost $180 million to build, or $12.5 million per net MW rating. Covanta received NO taxpayer subsidy. On 12/29/2011, Rollins received a $53.2 million ARRA Sec. 1603 grant from the taxpayers. Covanta occupies 50 acres on the Lincoln Rd. in West Enfield and except for the sign out at the road, you wouldn’t know it is there hidden in the woods. Rollins sprawls across 7 miles of high visibility ridgelines, dominating the views from the 13 Lincoln Lakes with 389 ft tall wind turbines. The site clearcut 1,000 acres and more than a million cubic yards of the ridges were blasted, leveled, cut & filled.

Now, to get to your point about employment. Covanta employs 24 and that number of jobs creates substantial payroll going into the area’s economy. Because its fuel source is scrap wood, bark, and wood chips, dozens more are indirectly employed in the timber industry, which in turn helps to support other jobs in the area. Known in Economics 101 as the “multiplier effect”. First Wind has never revealed its local payroll, but it is well known that Rollins created 3 local jobs, with nil multiplier effect.

Take this one step further.
We already know that the power purchase agreements for wind power are substantially greater than the ISO-NE average wholesale pricing, generally 8 cents per kwh compared to less than 5 cents per kwh. Because wind power is just a blip of surplus now, it really doesn’t have a great impact. Regarding off-shore wind development: right now shallow water projects using monopoles with off the shelf turbines (such as Block Island& Cape Wind) are at 24 cents per kwh; deep water floating turbines proposed for the Gulf of Maine will be far more costly. Combine those higher costs with all the states having arbitrary Renewables (which in New England is industrial wind) mandates of 20% to 50% and we are heading for an economic

Speaking of jobs,Texas Instruments computer chip plant in South Portland employs more than 1,000 high tech workers. TI probably has an economic development entity from somewhere in the world try every week to make a case for packing up that plant and moving it to a lower business overhead location. I use this as an example because computer chip making is a huge electricity consumer. Given all the other economic disadvantages of Maine, driving up the electricity cost could easily close a plant that has an huge economic impact. Do you want to jeopardize our economy by forcing hugely subsidized and expensive wind power onto our state’s business and all the regular folks who already pay some of the highest electricity rates in the USA?

Think beyond the wind industry propaganda. Wind power would never exist without unduly generous subsidies, selling Enron-inspired RECs (bought mostly by polluters because it is cheaper than investing in clean technology), and heinous arbitrary mandates. Meanwhile, the proliferation of sprawling, ugly industrial wind projects is destroying Maine’s highly touted “Quality of Place” that the prestigious Brookings Institute study in 2007 claimed to be Maine’s greatest asset. That, in turn, hurts Maine’s largest industry, tourism, that brings in more than $10 billion per year to our state and employs tens of thousands of Mainers.

By contrast, Wind power and its touted job impact is a total farce.

Source:  Posted by Brad Blake on September 5, 2014 | Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine | www.windtaskforce.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky