[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

John Muir Trust in challenge to SSE Renewables Stronelairg  

Credit:  Graham Huband, Business editor | The Courier | 27 August 2014 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

A leading conservation charity is seeking judicial review of the Scottish Government’s decision to approve a plan for a controversial £300 million Highland windfarm.

The Perthshire-based John Muir Trust said the decision by Energy Minister Fergus Ewing to consent SSE Renewables Stronelairg array near Fort Augustus in the Great Glen was inconsistent with the administration’s own measures to protect wild land.

The group said it had now lodged a petition at the Court of Session seeking judicial review of the decision and has called for donations to help fund the court challenge.

The process could take months to resolve and put severe pressure on the developer’s timescales.

The trust yesterday said it had acted as the Scottish Government had made a decision which contradicted the opinion of its own advisory body and came despite opposition from the Cairngorm National Park Authority and from local residents.

“Over the past year, the Scottish Government has made ground-breaking progress by adopting the new Wild Land Areas map of Scotland and, for the first time, recognising wild land as an important national asset,” trust chairman John Hutchison said.

“However, we believe the decision by the Energy Minister to give the go-ahead to Stronelairg without a public local inquiry is not consistent with Scottish Government measures to protect the best areas of wild land from industrialisation.

“This is the largest-ever windfarm approved in the Highlands, and was opposed by both the Government’s own advisory body on nature and landscape, SNH, and by the Cairngorms National Park Authority.

“Because of the scale of the development, and the breadth of opposition to it, we believe it should have been the subject of a public local inquiry.

“In the absence of proper democratic scrutiny, our trustees feel we had no choice but to seek a judicial review of the decision.

“The trust is now seeking donations to help us take forward this legal action.”

If built, the 67-turbine Stronelairg array would have a maximum installed capacity of 242MW – enough to power around 114,000 homes.

The project – which would take three years to construct on a site adjacent to SSE’s Glendoe Hydro electric scheme – is smaller than the 83-turbine site which SSE first sought planning permission for in 2012.

The larger scheme was given the go-ahead by Highland Council’s south planning committee in April last year, subject to conditions relating to transport arrangements and concrete batching,

SSE said it had addressed the issues raised and had also agreed to remove 16 turbines from the overall plan, reduce the height of a further 10 and reposition one.

At the time of the consent approval in June, the company’s lead director of wholesale generation development Colin Nicol said SSE was a “responsible developer” that enjoyed strong community relations in the Great Glen area as a result of its long-term hydro power presence.

A spokesperson for SSE Renewables last night said the company was disappointed by JMT’s decision to petition the courts.

“This petition for JR (judicial review) is particularly disappointing given the extent of the local support for the project and its location around existing hydroelectric infrastructure,” said the spokesperson.

“We will now respond to this legal challenge through the appropriate process.”

Source:  Graham Huband, Business editor | The Courier | 27 August 2014 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.