[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ministry of the Environment asks Dufferin Wind to guard against ‘potential’ water threat 

Credit:  By Chris Halliday | Orangeville Banner | August 18, 2014 | www.orangeville.com ~~

The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) is asking Dufferin Wind Power to seal the foundations of more than 300 utility poles to guard against possible groundwater contamination in Melancthon and Amaranth.

The Ontario Energy Board (OEB) approved Dufferin Wind’s plan to construct a 230 kV transmission line from its 49-turbine wind farm in Melancthon to Amaranth last year.

Earlier this summer, however, the MOE asked Dufferin Wind to revise its construction blueprint.

Ministry officials made that request after a local resident argued some utility pole foundations Dufferin Wind was constructing could act as conduits for surface water pollutants to enter the groundwater supply.

A memo written to municipal officials by Gary Tomlinson, senior environmental officer in the MOE’s Guelph office, identifies “it is possible that it can happen,” although he noted utility pole foundations aren’t particularly efficient pathways for large quantities of water.

“There is a small but nonetheless actual potential for surface water to travel to and possibly into the fractured limestone bedrock,” Tomlinson wrote. “That scenario is certainly concerning.”

The primary source of potable water in the area is found within the aquifer of the relatively shallow limestone bedrock underneath where Dufferin Wind’s transmission line is being built.

MOE spokesperson Lindsay Davidson said the retaining structures, or caissons, used by Dufferin Wind lend to the accumulation of surface water in and around the bases of the utility poles.

As a result, Dufferin Wind spokesperson Connie Roberts said the company agreed to “address the remote possibility” these caissons could transfer surface pollutants, such as fertilizers, into the bedrock in the event of heavy rain run-off or flooding.

“The mitigation actions by Dufferin Wind Power show an abundance of caution to prevent a very unlikely event,” she said in an email.

“We can find no other instance in the province of Ontario of another power installation that is taking the same precautionary measures.”

Dufferin Wind will seal all of its utility poles with bases that end within 2.5 metres of the limestone bedrock.

The remedial work will consist of installing a benonite clay seal both inside and outside of caissons, according to Tomlinson’s memo.

The MOE has given Dufferin Wind until Sept. 15 to complete the sealing program.

More than 300 utility poles, including 216 in Melancthon and 91 in Amaranth, will undergo the remedial work.

“The areas around the poles will be graded and drained to prevent the pooling of water around the poles and to direct water away from the pole bases,” Davidson said in an email.

“The ministry continues to routinely monitor the construction phase of the project to ensure compliance.”

Prior to the MOE’s request, Roberts noted Dufferin Wind’s transmission line construction plan had already received provincial approval.

As she explained, all the company’s utility poles currently adhere to provincial standards.

The mitigation measures agreed to by Dufferin Wind merely “go above and beyond” those provincial standards and regulations, Roberts added.

So, how did the MOE’s oversight fail to see this caisson conduit possibility?

For starters, Tomlinson wrote the utility pole construction plan was approved by the OEB.

He also noted that neither the MOE’s review of Dufferin Wind’s wind farm application or subsequent approval by the Environmental Review Tribunal identified it as a possibility.

“The concept of a utility pole providing a potential conduit for surface water into bedrock aquifers was not previously identified by this Ministry or any proponent,” Tomlinson wrote.

“(The MOE) foresees no additional requirements beyond existing programs currently in place.”

Source:  By Chris Halliday | Orangeville Banner | August 18, 2014 | www.orangeville.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky