LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Norfolk crab fishermen forced out to make way for offshore wind farm works 

Credit:  By Emily Gosden, Energy Editor | The Telegraph | 13 Aug 2014 | www.telegraph.co.uk ~~

Norfolk crab fishermen are being forced out of an area that has been fished for hundreds of years, after an energy company took them to court to make way for work on a giant offshore wind farm.

Dong Energy, which is majority-owned by the Danish Government, secured an injunction on Monday giving the fisherman until one minute past midnight on Friday to remove thousands of crab-fishing pots from the area, in The Wash about 17 miles off the North Norfolk coast.

The company is preparing to carry out a seismic survey of the seabed ahead of deciding whether to build the Race Bank project, a 91-turbine offshore wind farm covering an area of 29 square miles.

So far 20 out of 24 fishing vessels operating in the affected area have refused offers of compensation made by the company, claiming they are inadequate to cover their lost catch from having to move to a less crab-rich area for a period of up to 90 days at peak fishing season.

But Benj Sykes, head of Dong’s UK wind power business, said the offer was “generous” and covered its best estimate of the costs of lost catch, of moving the crab pots elsewhere and an extra payment to compensate for the disturbance.

He said the company had been talking to the fishermen since April but the fishermen had not provided detailed information about their typical catch.

Fishermen suggested the offer was in the region of £220 a day, or almost £20,000 over the period.

Nicky King, chairman of the Wells and District Inshore Fisherman’s Association, said: “All we are asking for is a fair settlement. Their negotiating style stinks.”

He said that bad weather had prevented the fishermen removing the crab pots so far and there would now be insufficient time to move them before the deadline. The injunction suggests the deadline may be extended in such circumstances but the fisherman say they are worried about the legal repercussions.

If the wind farm goes ahead the fishermen will face being excluded from the area for an 18-month period while the turbines are installed, and fear their activities in the area will be harmed permanently.

Mr King said: “They have taken one of the best fishing areas away from us and it will have a big impact on fishermen all over the north Norfolk coast. They are taking the subsidies that we pay as British consumers and tax payers and preventing us from doing the work we’ve done for hundreds of years.”

Barrie Deas, chief executive of the National Federation of Fishermen’s Organisations (NFFO), accused Dong of “bullying” and said it was almost unprecedented for an offshore developer to resort to court action. “Fishermen have a legitimate right to fish on their customary grounds and using a high court injunction to force them out of the way seems like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut,” he said.

He suggested Dong had “ left insufficient time to reach agreement with local fishermen”.

A spokesman for the company said going to court was “very much a last resort” and that it would continue discussions about compensation but had to carry out the seabed survey “on schedule to comply with the terms of our agreement for lease with The Crown Estate, who control access to the seabed”.

Source:  By Emily Gosden, Energy Editor | The Telegraph | 13 Aug 2014 | www.telegraph.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky