[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Brownback urges compromise on Kansas energy rule 

Credit:  Associated Press | July 24, 2014 | www.washingtontimes.com ~~

Gov. Sam Brownback called Wednesday for a compromise between wind-power advocates and opponents of a renewable-energy law for Kansas utilities to settle the rule’s future, but his office later said he wasn’t proposing to phase out the policy.

Brownback faced questions about a 2009 state energy law during an impromptu meeting with Statehouse reporters. The policy requires utilities to have wind and other renewable sources account for 15 percent of their peak capacity for generating electricity by 2016 and 20 percent by 2020.

Supporters contend the law has spurred the development of a vibrant wind-energy industry without much cost to consumers. Critics argue it is driving up electric bills and that the government is picking economic winners and losers.

Brownback said he has “a lot of people pushing me” on the issue. He supports wind energy because of its strong potential on the frequently gusty Plains, but his political base includes free-market GOP conservatives who oppose such mandates.

“Get something agreed to between the wind people and the people who are opposed this,” he said. “You’ve got to kind of get the big players to sit and half talk to each other.”

Brownback, who served in the U.S. Senate before becoming governor in 2011, compared the state’s requirement for utilities – known as the renewable portfolio standard, or RPS – to federal tax credits for ethanol production. He said ethanol credits were important to launching the industry but became unnecessary.

“RPS, you’re in a similar position, I think,” Brownback said. “You need a four-year phase-out.”

But hours later, Brownback spokeswoman Eileen Hawley said in speaking of a phase-out, the governor intended to refer to federal energy production tax credits. She noted his comment that he supports wind energy because, “I’m a Kansan first.”

“And this is really good for Kansas,” the governor said. “This is a fabulous wind state.”

The renewable-energy mandate has been targeted by the powerful Kansas Chamber of Commerce and Americans for Prosperity, the anti-tax, small-government group with ties to billionaire industrialist brothers Charles and David Koch.

Lobbying reports show AFP’s state chapter spent $383,000 from January through April on media advertising to build support for repealing the law, while two wind-energy advocacy groups spent about $57,000 on media and communications.

AFP State Director Jeff Glendening said critics of the renewable-energy rule sought this year to negotiate with the wind-energy industry but found no interest. He said both the requirement and federal tax credits are subsidies and, “Neither of them are free market ideas.”

But he said of a potential compromise, “We are willing to sit down and listen.”

Moti Rieber, an Overland Park rabbi and director of Kansas Interfaith Power & Light, said opponents of the renewable-energy rule negotiated with themselves this year, rather than involving wind-energy advocates. Rieber’s group is a coalition of religious groups lobbying on environmental issues.

“If you repeal it or phase it out, what you’re saying is, ‘We’re finished at 20 percent,’” Rieber said. “There’s no reason to say that.”


Americans for Prosperity’s Kansas chapter: http://americansforprosperity.org/kansas/

Kansas Interfaith Power & Light: http://kansasipl.org/

Source:  Associated Press | July 24, 2014 | www.washingtontimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky