[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Woodmancott wind farm plan plan rejected 

Credit:  Rural wind farm plans rejected | BBC News | 26 June 2014 | www.bbc.co.uk ~~

Plans for six wind turbines in countryside near Basingstoke have been rejected by councillors.

TCI Renewables had applied to put up the 130m (426ft) turbines at Woodmancott.

Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council raised concerns over the impact on local ecology and a nearby airfield.

The Save our Scenic South Downs group, which had also opposed the development, called it a “victory for common sense”.

The campaigners claimed the turbines would “scar the countryside” and set a “dangerous precedent”.

A spokeswoman for TCI said: “Hampshire has no wind farms and the Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council last night sent the message that despite all their policy statements to the contrary they simply do not want them.

“TCI will review the wording of the decision notice before deciding how best to proceed.”

The firm had said the effect on “landscape character” of turbines would have to be balanced against “the acknowledged and significant benefits” of generating renewable energy.

Council planners said the developers had failed to show there would not be an adverse impact on the local ecology, the operation of Chilbolton Observatory’s meteorological radar as well as safety at nearby Lasham Airfield.

The application was turned down by the council’s development committee by eight votes to four.

Source:  Rural wind farm plans rejected | BBC News | 26 June 2014 | www.bbc.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky