[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Bills rise to pay ‘unnecessary’ subsidies for green power  

Credit:  Tim Webb | The Times | 27 June 2014 | www.thetimes.co.uk ~~

Households face an extra £16 a year on their energy bills due to £16.6 billion in green subsidies paid to five giant offshore wind farms and three biomass plants, the government’s spending watchdog has warned.

The National Audit Office [NAO] criticised the government for awarding the “unnecessarily generous” subsidies, which could turn out to be a waste of public money.

Tom Greatrex, the shadow energy minister, said: “Consumers will be rightly outraged if they are left to foot the bill for this Tory-led government’s incompetence.”

The NAO report is the latest blow to the government’s controversial plan to fund a massive expansion of wind farms and other renewables, which already faces a legal challenge from Drax, the North Yorkshire power station.

The plan means offshore wind farms are guaranteed to receive three times the current wholesale electricity price, while the biomass projects get double.

The NAO criticised the government for awarding the subsidies regardless of how much each specific project cost, which could result in the developers making excess profits.

Ministers should have held a competition where subsidies were awarded to the lowest cost projects instead, saying it was “not convinced that the government sufficiently protected consumers’ interests”.

Ministers had originally planned to award them last summer in order to prevent a construction freeze of green power plants which could threaten the UK’s renewable energy targets.

However the plan was delayed by a year, with the NAO questioning whether meeting the targets was still an issue. It noted that the Department of Energy’s own business case showed that there was “no clear economic monetised benefit” from going ahead.

The public accounts committee, which will hold a hearing into the subsidies next week, also criticised the government for failing to include a claw-back provision, allowing any excess profits to be claimed back from renewable developers. Margaret Hodge, who chairs committee, said: “I am frustrated that, despite the huge consumer subsidy that has gone into supporting these projects, the department has failed to put in place any arrangements to recoup consumers’ money.”

The Department of Energy said: “As the NAO’s report recognises, these early contracts are designed to offer better value to billpayers than the previous system. Without that investment, projects would have been unable to go ahead or been significantly delayed.”

Source:  Tim Webb | The Times | 27 June 2014 | www.thetimes.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.