[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Dispute over Lake Minnetonka wind turbine continues in court cases  

Credit:  Article by: KELLY SMITH | Star Tribune | June 4, 2014 | /www.startribune.com ~~

The dispute over a Lake Minnetonka wind turbine that started out between the owner and city is now a complicated, litigious quarrel involving neighbors and property rights.

For Orono lakeshore residents next to Jay Nygard’s home, the 29-foot-tall wind turbine he installed in 2010 is a nuisance. And that, along with other disputes between the neighbors, has sparked eight lawsuits over the past three years – ranging from property issues to Nygard’s defamation lawsuit against neighbor Penny Rogers for statements she made at a city meeting (a case that he lost).

This week, another judge ruled in favor of Nygard’s neighbors, Rogers and Peter Lanpher, ordering the wind turbine’s removal.

“He takes away our freedom and enjoyment in our property,” Lanpher said about the turbine near land he and his wife bought in 2004 to eventually retire on. “It’s an eyesore.”

Another judge already ordered Nygard to take down the wind turbine last year – an order he is in contempt of and will be back in court for on June 11. But the saga isn’t over yet. Nygard said Wednesday he plans to appeal the decision in Rogers’ and Lanpher’s case.

“They seem to think they can control our property, and what we do on our property is their business,” Nygard said. “It’s my right to have it.”

The city has said that the small residential lot, less than a third of an acre on the west arm of the lake, wasn’t suitable for wind machines, and denied Nygard’s building permit application in 2010. But he built the 750-pound wind turbine mounted on a galvanized pole anyway.

The city sued Nygard and the case made its way through district court to the Minnesota Court of Appeals, which ruled in Nygard’s favor but returned the case to the lower court for further consideration. Last year, a judge ruled in the city’s favor and said Nygard’s generator endangered public safety. His appeal was dismissed.

Then, in December, the city changed its ordinance to prohibit wind energy conversion systems within any of its zoning districts. Last month, Nygard sued the city for prohibiting the wind turbine, citing a state law that says local government can establish requirements for constructing small wind energy conversion systems of less than 5,000 kilowatts – like his turbine – but, he said, not ban them outright.

City Attorney Soren Mattick said Wednesday that the city remains committed to having the wind turbine removed.

So do Nygard’s neighbors. Rogers and Lanpher said it affects their lake property, creating a loud noise and an “unbearable strobe-like effect” in their bedroom and living room when the sun hits the blades.

“This shouldn’t happen to us or anyone,” Lanpher said. “We’re trying to get the peace and quiet everyone deserves.”

Hennepin County Judge Susan Robiner agreed this week, ordering Nygard to take the turbine down and pay nearly $8,000 for cutting a sugar maple near the wind turbine that Lanpher said was on his property.

“A reasonable person would conclude that the strobe effect of the spinning turbine on [Rogers and Lanpher’s] living spaces constitutes an ongoing interference with [their] enjoyment of their property,” she wrote. “The intense flashing light and sound invades their living room, bedroom, and deck. No person should be expected to endure the detrimental effects the wind turbine creates.”

Attorney Robert Tennant is representing Rogers and Lanpher as well as neighbors Patrick and Nancy Walsh in five out of eight lawsuits so far with Nygard and his wife. The Walshes’ current case, Tennant said, is going through arbitration later this month. The wind turbine, he said, was a final straw in a list of grievances from the neighbors about Nygard – from painting their fences to trimming the tree – claims that Nygard called “ridiculous.”

“These people just want to be left alone,” Tennant said of the two couples. “They don’t want to walk out their door and be bothered.”

Source:  Article by: KELLY SMITH | Star Tribune | June 4, 2014 | /www.startribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.