[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Heartland to study its wind turbine’s effect on wildlife  

Credit:  Maria Nagle | The Pantagraph | May 22, 2014 | www.pantagraph.com ~~

NORMAL – Heartland Community College will be doing a more complete study later this year to determine if its wind turbine is killing too many birds and bats.

A similar study last fall was incomplete because a malfunction shut down the turbine before its impact on wildlife could be determined, said Heartland President Rob Widmer.

Heartland’s consultant, Midwest Environmental Consulting Services out of Yorkville, contracted with a group from Millikin University in Decatur to conduct the 2013 study as well as this fall’s study.

Unlike last year’s study, the upcoming study will be done with the land around the wind turbine site at the Normal campus cleared of vegetation. The change was recommended by the consultant when the contract was renewed in March and called for by the the John Wesley Powell Audubon Society of Bloomingon-Normal.

Most of the turbine’s construction cost was paid for with a $950,000 U.S. Department of Energy grant, which required an environmental assessment be done as part of the funding process in 2010.

As part of that assessment, the college agreed to do a voluntary, one-time, post-construction study of bird and bat deaths during their fall migration seasons.

The Audubon chapter supported the application in 2010 contingent on Heartland doing a scientifically based study, said Angelo Capparella, who is the chapter’s conservation chairman and an associate zoology professor at Illinois State University.

Both the wind power industry and Illinois Department of Natural Resources recognize that removing crops is the best scientific standard, Capparella said.

“It’s just common sense,” he added. “Basically, they get hit by the running blades so we look for dead birds or bats. If a bird lands in a cornfield or soybean field it’s very difficult to find them.”

The land around Heartland’s turbine was not cleared for the study last year because a farmer who leases the plot had crops planted that were not ready for harvest. Also, the college was instructed to use U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service protocols, which do not require a clear substrate for the survey, Widmer said.

This year, the farmer has been told to plant a crop that can be harvested before the study, Widmer said.

“This is good news,” Capparella said Wednesday. “We will finally know if there is or is not any impact on birds or bats from this turbine, And, if so, then we can talk about ways to address that.”

Source:  Maria Nagle | The Pantagraph | May 22, 2014 | www.pantagraph.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.