[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Project developers gave nearly $700,000 to lobbyists  

Credit:  By Erin Smith | Boston Herald | May 20, 2014 | bostonherald.com ~~

The developers behind the controversial Cape Wind project have shelled out nearly $700,000 for federal and state lobbyists since the Nantucket Sound wind farm received federal approval four years ago, according to Herald analysis and a government watchdog group.

Cape Wind developers paid $380,000 to DLA Piper and $130,000 to Capitol City Group since 2011, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks federal lobbyists. The center has dubbed DLA Piper a “heavy hitter” – or one of the 140 biggest overall donors to candidates since the 1990 federal elections.

Developers for the Cape Wind project, which received federal approval in 2010, have paid Marshfield lawyer and state lobbyist Neal Costello $180,000 since 2011, records show.

Meanwhile, Gary J. Klein, a national lobbyist with DLA Piper hired by Cape Wind, gave $8,334 to his firm’s political action committee, which hands out hundreds of thousands of dollars annually to politicians, including those who lobbied for Cape Wind, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Center data also shows Gerald Harrington, Capitol City Group’s Cape Wind lobbyist, donated $36,300 to politicians and committees since 2013, including $3,600 to U.S. Sen. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.); $2,600 to both the Democratic State Committee of Massachusetts and U.S. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.); and $1,500 to U.S. Rep. Joseph P. Kennedy III (D-Mass.).

Source:  By Erin Smith | Boston Herald | May 20, 2014 | bostonherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.