[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Pair of turbines go-ahead after initial refusal 

Credit:  Written by ROB SMYTH | Burton Mail | 18 May 2014 | www.burtonmail.co.uk ~~

Planning permission has been granted to proposals for two separate wind turbines – despite both plans initially being refused.

The Planning Inspectorate has overruled the decision of planning chiefs at East Staffordshire Borough Council for a 50kW turbine at Dunsfield Farm, Thornley Lane, Newborough, and a Northern Power turbine at Hart’s Farm, in Abbots Bromley.

The main reason behind the initial refusal of both plans was based around the impact they would have on the character and appearance of the landscape.

A spokesman for the Planning Inspectorate, in terms of the Dunsfield Farm application, said: “The proposal would represent a sustainable form of development.

“It would use a natural resource to produce pollution-free electricity and would make a small but positive contribution to renewable energy supply.

“To the extent that this would result in some degree of negative landscape change, I consider this would be outweighed by the benefits of a generation of renewable energy.”

The development of the turbine will now have to begin in the next three years. If it fails to produce electricity for six months then it would have to be removed and work undertaken to protect any species impacted by the planned work.

In terms of the Hart’s Farm application, a spokesman said: “The overall conclusion is that, subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions, the proposal is acceptable and planning permission should be granted.

“It was also concluded that, while the proposal would introduce a modern vertical component and effect some scenic change, its impact would not be such as to significantly detract from the landscape’s overall character.

A variety of conditions have been imposed similar to the Dunsfield Farm turbine.

Source:  Written by ROB SMYTH | Burton Mail | 18 May 2014 | www.burtonmail.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky