[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents call for greater protection for Perthshire after windfarm decision 

Credit:  By Mark Mackay | The Courier | 16 May 2014 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

With the expansion of the Calliacher windfarm balked for now, there have been calls for greater protections for Highland Perthshire.

Proposals to create an additional seven turbines near Amulree were rejected by Perth and Kinross Council on Wednesday.

Councillors expressed concern that existing turbines were already damaging the region.

There was also significant disquiet about their impact on the environment, given that the new turbines could have been visible from national treasures including Schiehallion, Ben Lawers and the Rob Roy Way.

In the wake of the decision, Strathtay member Barbara Vaughan said that communities need greater protection from the creeping industrialisation.

She called for updated legislation to guide local policy on green energy to be expedited as a matter of urgency.

The Calliacher expansion could yet return, should developer SSE appeal the council’s decision to the Scottish Ministers.

It was by such means that the original 14-turbine farm – which became operational last year after a year of disruption for local communities during construction – was granted permission.

In addition, proposals for a variety of new Highland Perthshire windfarm schemes, amounting to more than 100 turbines, are currently in the planning process.

“I was delighted with the decision of the development control committee to reject the additional turbines at Calliacher,” Ms Vaughan said. “These turbines would have been visible from key tourist spots, such as the King’s Seat in Birnam and Schiehallion.

“Yet more wind turbines can do nothing to attract tourists and are, in fact, highly likely to deter them and so have a negative impact on the many businesses in the area that are dependent upon the tourist industry.”

It was made clear at Wednesday’s meeting that councillors should consider each individual windfarm application on its own merits, without recourse to others that may or may not be brought forward.

Residents said they could not afford such a short-sighted view and questioned the nature of the planning process.

Source:  By Mark Mackay | The Courier | 16 May 2014 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky