LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Allerdale council ‘must take control over turbines’ says report 

Credit:  By Victoria Brenan | News & Star | 14 May 2014 | www.newsandstar.co.uk ~~

Allerdale council should take control over wind power, councillors will hear today.

A review of the issue will be debated by the full council following concerns about the way the planning service was operating.

A Planning Improvement Peer Challenge report has recommended a shake up of planning including cutting the membership of the planning committee and that a planning policy working group should be set up.

Kevin Kerrigan, head of development services, said that Allerdale was “one of the windiest places on mainland UK” and a hot spot for windfarms and turbines in the county.

Since 2009, 112 applications have been received, often generating “large opposition”.

“Wind power must become a corporate issue and not just be seen as a reactionary, regulatory role for planers and councillors on development panel,” he said. “We recommend that the council take stronger corporate control over renewable energy and especially wind power and be more proactive in its community leadership role.

“It should grasp opportunities to examine the council’s brownfield assets and seize opportunities for selling wind generation power to support council priorities. While some objectors or commentators might say this is not a suitable role for the council, it is surely a far better strategy to being picked off at appeal and losing costs.”

The report said a recent allegation about a planning officer working too closely with a developer but concluded “there were no grounds for believing this”.

“We did feel lessons could be learned in how emails were phrased to remove any doubt or ambiguity,” he added. Issues raised last year included the way development panel meetings were conducted, including the way members interacted with the public. Concerns were then raised by some councillors about alleged collusion between a planning officer and a developer. The full council will debate the issue tomorrow night at Hundith Hill in Cockermouth.

Source:  By Victoria Brenan | News & Star | 14 May 2014 | www.newsandstar.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky