LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plans for second wind turbine rejected by Angus council 

Credit:  13 May 2014 | www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk ~~

Plans for a second 86-metre wind turbine at the former Tealing airfield north of Dundee have been rejected by Angus Council.

Landowner Charles Simmers and Green Cat Renewables have already built a similar turbine, which was approved on appeal by the Scottish Government.

They had argued that another installation would provide an additional source of income to offset increasing energy and fuel prices.

The council received 12 letters of objection and six in support of the application.

Planning officer Ruari Kelly noted that guidance on landscape capacity for wind energy in Angus advised that Tealing should not have turbines greater than 50 metres high.

“In this instance the proposed turbine is 86.5 metres to blade tip and is similar to the recently erected turbine on the airfield.

“I consider that the existing turbine relates poorly to the scale of the surrounding landscape. Notwithstanding this, the appeal reporter that allowed the existing turbine considered the landscape had capacity to accommodate a turbine of that scale and the turbine has now been erected.”

Mr Kelly said there were 16 homes within 1km of the site, several of which would experience major or moderate effects from the turbine.

“I consider that from the general environs of the properties the wind turbine would be a dominant and unavoidable presence that would adversely affect the amenity of the occupants.”

It is now up to Mr Simmers to decide if he wishes to appeal against the refusal.

Source:  13 May 2014 | www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky