LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Grant failure casts doubt on future of Maine offshore wind project 

Credit:  Reported By: Jennifer Mitchell | The Maine Public Broadcasting Network | 05/07/2014 | www.mpbn.net ~~

Some disappointing news came today for the deep water wind project known as Aqua Ventus. That’s the pilot project led by a University of Maine development team. Aqua Ventus was competing for federal development money. But, as Jennifer Mitchell reports, the project was not selected for full funding. So now, its fate is less certain. Meanwhile, environmental advocates are still lamenting a decision they say chased away another wind developer.

Aqua Ventus is a runner up – the fourth of six projects considered for funding under a U.S. Department of Energy program. While the first three projects were fully funded by the DOE, Aqua Ventus will receive $3 million for further research and development – a figure far smaller than the $47 million the group was seeking.

“it is disappointing because it was a path that was fairly well laid out,” says Jake Ward, vice president of innovation and economic development at UMaine. With the grant, he says the project would have been funded to completion.

What happens now is unclear. Ward says the consortium was hoping to use the funds to move from the research phase to the construction and placement of two turbines near Monhegan Island.

“There may be other sources of funding that would fund a smaller project – perhaps a single turbine, or perhaps turbines located in other places,” he says. “What we do know is that having 100 percent design and engineering complete will lead to the marketablility of the technology.”

So the project isn’t dead, Ward stresses. One of the DOE’s top three picks for grant funding was another floating platform design for offshore wind, developed by Principle Power in Oregon. The Aqua Ventus project is similar, but seeks to become the first of its kind, using new composite technology developed at the University of Maine, rather than steel.

A year ago, the development team celebrated the successful launch of its demonstration project, VolternUS (left), which became the first such project in North America to send power to a grid. The eventual goal is to harness more of the powerful energy blowing off Maine’s rocky coast, with the development of a 500-megawatt farm.

But that vision is now slightly smaller on the horizon, to the dismay of environmentalists. “It’s particularly upsetting, I think, if we see this in the context of what’s been going on with offshore wind efforts in Maine,” says Dylan Voorhees, of the Natural Resources Council of Maine.

Voorhees says Gov. Paul LePage last year chased away an attractive suitor for Maine’s offshore wind industry, Norway’s Statoil, which was poised to develop a $120 million offshore wind project. The company, having received a nod from the Maine Public Utilities Commission, pulled out after the process was opened up to bid to give U Maine a chance to compete – a move seen by some as an attempt to diminish the chances of a project succeeding.

Voorhees says while the University-led project has done fabulous work, offshore wind isn’t gaining enough traction. “What we really need, clearly, is a partnership between the university, the governmnt, state and federal and private investors,” he says. “That’s what’s going to make offshore wind happen in Maine.”

While environmental advocates are disappointed, Democrats are wondering what the headline would have been if Statoil was still invested in Maine – either on its own, or perhaps in partnership with the UMaine project.

“Neither one are moving ahead,” says Maine Senate President Justin Alfond, “and instead of being able to move our state forward as a world leader, a world innovator in renewable energy, we now are struggling to figure out how we’re going to bring in outside capital.”

“It’s hard to know whether the competition from Statoil would have rendered a different result – Principle Power has been identified as one of the premier technologies on the West Coast,” says Patrick Woodcock, director of the Governor’s Energy Office.

Woodcock is one of the people, along with Gov. LePage, being blamed by Democratic legislative leaders for Maine’s failure to obtain federal funding for a viable offshore wind project. But Woodcock says the news that Aqua Ventus did not get a bigger grant doesn’t mean the project is dead.

In a joint statement, Sens. Susan Collins and Angus King said the $3 million promised to Aqua Ventus means that the DOE recognizes the project’s “enormous potential.”

While Maine’s Congressional delegation searches for the silver lining, members of the Monhegan Energy Task Force, a group which had raised the question of impacts to their community from the Aqua Ventus turbines, said the group will continue to see how things develop in the area, but will assume that the project will still be going forward.

Patty Wight contributed reporting to this story.

Source:  Reported By: Jennifer Mitchell | The Maine Public Broadcasting Network | 05/07/2014 | www.mpbn.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky