[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

US Navy tells E.on to move turbines  

Credit:  8 May 2014 by Patrick Smith | Windpower Monthly | www.windpowermonthly.com ~~

E.on has agreed to move the planned location of 29 turbines at a wind project in Oregon as a result of concerns from the US navy.

The developer will relocate the turbines, which are part of the 535MW Brush Canyon wind farm, due to the navy’s concerns over the obstruction of flight paths from the nearby Boardman naval weapons systems training facility.

E.on has also agreed to keep the height of transmission lines for the project to under 37 metres. The project is currently going through the permitting process and is due to be completed in 2017.

The navy said that the concessions were necessary as “wind turbines located in close proximity to or within navy airspace can interfere with critical training and testing, as well as radar and telecommunications.”

Roger Natsuhara, navy principle deputy assistant secretary for energy, installations and environment, said: “As wind energy increasingly contributes to the nation’s energy portfolio, it will be vital to maintain positive relationships with developers to protect critical navy capabilities.”

In 2012 President Barack Obama blocked the construction of four 10MW wind farms near the same naval base by Chinese-owned firm Sany due to national security concerns. It was the first time in 22 years that a US president blocked a foreign business deal.

These planned projects were much closer to the base than Brush Canyon, however, with a number of the Sany turbines directly in the navy’s restricted airspace.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  8 May 2014 by Patrick Smith | Windpower Monthly | www.windpowermonthly.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter